IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1274 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
Sri Manoj Kumar M
Son of Manjunath
Presently aged about 26 years
Residing at No.30/4
Sneha Nandini Apartments
Dollar Colony Scheme
Nandini Layout
Bengaluru-560 096.
&Appellant
(By Sri Tomy Sebastian, Senior Advocate for
Melanie Sebastian, Advocate)
AND:
State of Karnataka
By Mahalakshmi Layout P.S.
Bengaluru City
Represented by
The State Public Prosecutor
High Court Buildings
Bengaluru-560 001.
&Respondent
(By Sri K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP)
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2)
of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment dated
11.06.2019, and sentence dated 13.06.2019, passed
by the LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,
CCH-55, sitting in Child Friendly Court, Bengaluru
:: 2 ::
Urban District, in Spl.C.C. No.46/2014, convicting the
appellant/accused for the offence punishable under
Sections 376, 306 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act.
This
Criminal
Appeal
having
been
heard
&
reserved
on
28.07.2022,
coming
on
for
pronouncement this day, the Court pronounced the
following:
The accused in Special C.C.46/2014 on the
file of LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Court
and Child Friendly Court, Bengaluru, has preferred
this
appeal
challenging
the
judgment
of
his
conviction
the
offences
punishable
under
sections 306 and 376(3) IPC read with section 6 of
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act
(8POCSO Act9 for short).
2. Precisely stated, the prosecution case is
that the accused introduced himself to the girl via
social media (e-mail ID and face book), developed
friendship, allured and seduced her to gratify his
sexual desire. When he refused to marry her, she
committed suicide on 5.11.2013. The girl9s age
:: 3 ::
was about 14 years; and she was a student of 9th
standard. The father of the girl (PW1) made a
report
of
this
incident
to
the
police.
The
investigation led to accused being charge sheeted
for the offences punishable under sections 376,
306 and 201 IPC, and section 5 (l) read with
section 6 of POCSO Act. Charges were framed for
the same offences. At the conclusion of trial, the
trial court while acquitting the accused of the
offence under section 201 IPC convicted him for
the offences punishable under section 376(3) IPC
read with section 6 of POCSO Act and section 306
IPC. He was sentenced to 3 years of simple
imprisonment and fine of Rs.15,000/- with default
sentence of three months for the offence under
section 306 IPC; and rigorous imprisonment for 20
years besides fine of Rs.25,000/- with default
sentence of simple imprisonment for one year for
the offence under section 376(3) IPC read with
section
6
of
POCSO
Act.
The
sentence
of
:: 4 ::
imprisonment for both the offences was directed to
run concurrently.
3. On the conclusion of trial, in order to
convict the accused for the offences punishable
under section 376(3) IPC read with section 6 of
POCSO Act and section 306 IPC, the trial court has
recorded the following reasons : -
3.1. The evidence of PWs1, 2, 3 to 5, 7, 8,
10, 20, 22 and 29 in regard to allegations made in
the first information report given to the police and
the death note is material. Though the oral
evidence of PW1 and PW2 and other circumstantial
witnesses is not impressive to establish that they
were aware of the friendship between the accused
and the girl as they came to know about it only
after seeing the death note, the evidence of PW1
and 2 in regard to other aspects of the matter is
believable. It is held by the trial court that the
evidence of PW1 and PW2 that when they observed
:: 5 ::
their daughter on 1.11.2013, she appeared upset
and when they questioned her, she told them
about her being in contact with the accused and
she had given the phone number to him, is not
seriously
contested
and
contradicted
by
the
defence. In this view, the death note left behind
by the girl as per Ex.P11 becomes material.
Extracting the contents of Ex.P11, it is further held
by
the
trial
court
that
it
has
remained
unchallenged. If the cross-examination of PW1 to
8 is considered, it appears that the defence has
made no attempt to deny the death note. Thus
the contents of Ex.P11 reveal that the person who
was responsible for sexual act leading to suicide
committed by the girl was Manoj Kumar s/o
Manjunath who was residing in Bengaluru in his
aunt9s house and studying in II Year B.Com in
Sheshadripuram
College.
These
facts
clearly
establish the identity of the accused. It is further
held that the death note also indicates that the
:: 6 ::
girl was subjected to intercourse more than once
and thereby the offence under section 5(l) read
with section 6 of the POCSO Act is established and
therefore the accused can be held guilty.
4. I have heard the arguments of Sri. Tomy
Sebastain, learned Senior Counsel appearing for
Melaine Sebastain for the appellant/accused and
Sri.
K.Nageshwarappa,
learned
HCGP
the
respondent.
5. The points that the learned counsel argued
will be referred to later, but their arguments give
rise to following points for discussion:
(i)
I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.