HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S. KINAGI
SMT.RUKMINI W/O LATE RAMALINGAPPA DHABEENAVARU – Appellant
Versus
SHIVARAJ S/O ISMAILAPPA DHABEENAVARU – Respondent
This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and
decree dated 02.08.2014 passed in R.A.No.32/2013
by the Senior Civil Judge, Humnabad, confirming the
judgment and decree dated 05.10.2013 passed in
O.S.No.33/2011 by the Principal Civil Judge at
Humnabad.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are
referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.
Appellants are the defendants and respondent is the
plaintiff before the Trial Court.
3. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal
briefly stated are as under:
4
That the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and
permanent injunction with respect to RS.No.154/3
measuring 31 guntas situated at Talmadgi Village. It
is the case of the plaintiff that the father of the
plaintiff - Ismailappa had 3 sons namely Tukappa,
Mallappa and Shivaraj (Plaintiff). The land bearing
RS.No.154 measuring 2 acres 11 guntas, standing in
the name of Ismailappa. After his demises plaintiff
and his brothers got effected partition and in the said
partition suit land RS.No.154/3 measuring 31 guntas
was fallen to the share of plaintiff and the name of the
plaintiff was mutated in RTC and he is the absolute
owner and possessor of the suit land. Fu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.