SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 55657

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S. KINAGI
SMT.RUKMINI W/O LATE RAMALINGAPPA DHABEENAVARU – Appellant
Versus
SHIVARAJ S/O ISMAILAPPA DHABEENAVARU – Respondent


This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and

decree dated 02.08.2014 passed in R.A.No.32/2013

by the Senior Civil Judge, Humnabad, confirming the

judgment and decree dated 05.10.2013 passed in

O.S.No.33/2011 by the Principal Civil Judge at

Humnabad.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are

referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.

Appellants are the defendants and respondent is the

plaintiff before the Trial Court.

3. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal

briefly stated are as under:

4

That the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and

permanent injunction with respect to RS.No.154/3

measuring 31 guntas situated at Talmadgi Village. It

is the case of the plaintiff that the father of the

plaintiff - Ismailappa had 3 sons namely Tukappa,

Mallappa and Shivaraj (Plaintiff). The land bearing

RS.No.154 measuring 2 acres 11 guntas, standing in

the name of Ismailappa. After his demises plaintiff

and his brothers got effected partition and in the said

partition suit land RS.No.154/3 measuring 31 guntas

was fallen to the share of plaintiff and the name of the

plaintiff was mutated in RTC and he is the absolute

owner and possessor of the suit land. Fu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top