KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT.T.M.DECHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – Respondent
The petitioner, a Stenographer working in the
respondent-Kodagu Zilla Panchayath is before this
Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
questioning the correctness and legality of order bearing
No.
¸ÀAPÉÆ.f.¥ÀA:DqÀ½vÀ:1:183:2012-13
dated
02.01.2015
(Annexure-V)
whereby
the
petitioner
is
imposed
punishment of demotion from the post of Stenographer
to Typist and for a writ of mandamus directing the
respondent to grant all the consequential benefits upon
quashing the impugned order.
2.
Heard
the
learned
counsel
Sri.M.Subramanya Bhat for the petitioner and the
learned counsel Sri.T.I.Abdulla for the respondent.
3.
Learned counsel Sri.M.Subramanya Bhat
submits that by virtue of the interim order dated
22.01.2015, the petitioner continued to work as
Stenographer in the respondent-Zilla Panchayth and
impugned order of demotion is not given effect to. It is
3
submitted that the petitioner was appointed on
03.07.1989
on
daily
wages
basis
as
typist.
Subsequently, the petitioner9s services were regularized
in the post of Typist on 03.07.1999 by the respondent-
Zilla Panchayth. The petitioner is said to have passed
senior short hand examination conducted by the
Karnataka Secondary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.