KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
ADIL PARVEEZ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order
dated 4-06-2022, by which, the Additional City Civil and
Sessions Judge, FTSC-1, Bengaluru in Special C.C.No.138 of 2015
rejects a memo filed by the petitioner seeking assistance of a
translator to the questions posed for recording statement of the
petitioner under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C.
2. Heard Sri Mohamed Nasiruddin, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri K.S.Abhijith, learned High Court Government
Pleader for the respondent.
3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition as
borne out from the pleadings are as follows:
3
The petitioner is the accused of a complaint being registered
on 11-12-2014 alleging that on 06-12-2014 when the mother of the
victim was not in the house, the petitioner goes into the house on
the ground that he would teach her Quran and sends her sister
Asiya to bring chocolate from a shop outside the house. When Asiya
went out to bring chocolate, it is alleged that the petitioner had
behaved with the victim in a manner that would become punishable
under the provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Act, 2012 (8POCSO Act9 for short). The issue is not wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.