HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
SRI BALLEKATTE SOMANNA THIPPE SWAMY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER – Respondent
The petitioner has challenged the validity of the
Assessment Order passed under Section 143(3) of the
Income Tax Act dated 19.12.2019 for the Assessment Year
2017-18 and also the Computation Sheet at Annexure- A1.
The petitioner has also sought for issuance of writ of
certiorari to quash the Notice of Demand at Annexure- A2
issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act.
2.
The petitioner submits that pursuant to the Notice
issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act dated
19.07.2019, time was granted to file reply by 30.07.2019.
3
It is further submitted that a fresh Notice came to be issued
at Annexure- G once again on 17.12.2019 calling for reply to
be furnished by 21.12.2019. It is further submitted that as
regard to the Notice dated 17.12.2019, the petitioner had
made out reply, copy of which is enclosed at Annexure- J.
3.
It is submitted that the Assessing Officer has
proceeded to pass the Order of Assessment on 19.12.2019,
though as per Annexure- G time was allowed for furnishing
of reply till 21.12.2019.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue
submits that due to change in the incumbent, it appears that
Notice was issued once again as per Annexure- G and the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.