IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON9BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.3539/2021 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. S. BHARATHI,
W/O LATE RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
HOUSE WIFE.
2.
KUM. HAMSA,
D/O LATE RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS,
APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR
NATURAL GUARDIAN,
MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1.
3.
SHANKARAPPA,
S/O KARIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST.
4.
LAKSHMAMMA,
W/O SHANKARAPPA,
(WRONGLY MENTIONED KARIYAPPA
IN THE TRAIL COURT JUDGMENT)
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST.
- 2 -
ALL ARE RESIDING AT,
OBALAPURA VILLAGE,
SRIRAMPURA HOBALI,
HOSADURGA TALUK,
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 3 577 527.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI RANGANATHA K.P.,
S/O PARANNA K.,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT KONDAPURA JANTHIKOLALU VILLAGE,
HOSADURGA TALUK,
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 3 577 527.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
TATA AIG GENRAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
HALLA MARK BUILDING,
3RD DESAI CROSS,
BESIDE (INDUSTRIAL BANK)
HUBLI.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENCED WITH)
***
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 16.05.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.840/2018 ON
THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MACT,
HOSADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, K.S.HEMALEKHA J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
This appeal is preferred by the claimants, who
are the wife, child and parents of the deceased
Ramesh assailing the judgment and award dated
16/05/2020, passed in MVC.No.840/2018 on the file
of the Senior Civil Judge & Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, Hosadurga (<the Tribunal= for short) seeking
enhancement of compensation, whereby the Tribunal
has awarded total compensation of Rs.49,77,000/-
with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of
petition till the date of deposit.
The claimants filed the claim petition
MVC.No.840/2018
seeking
compensation
of
Rs.89,00,000/- on account of death of one Ramesh
who died in a road traffic accident that occurred on
29/01/2018 at 6.00 p.m. when the deceased was
proceeding on Honda motorcycle bearing registration
No.KA-16/EH-7026 as a pillion rider, when he reached
- 4 -
near APMC gate at Alankar bar on Huliyaru-Hosadurga
Road, the rider of another motorcycle bearing
registration No.KA-16/EJ-0519 rode the motorcycle in
a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the
deceased9s
motorcycle,
due
to
the
impact
the
deceased Ramesh fell down and sustained grievous
injuries and on 25/05/2018 he succumbed to the
injuries.
3.
It is the contention of the claimants that
the deceased was hale and healthy at the time of
accident and was aged about 35 years, was earning
Rs.50,000/- per month as he was working as a
conductor and was also doing agricultural work. The
claimants are solely dependent upon the income of
the deceased and hence, sought for compensation.
In pursuance of the notice issued by the
Tribunal, respondent Nos.1 and 2 appeared, but
- 5 -
respondent No.1 did not choose to file any objection.
Respondent No.2 insuranc9e company filed objections
contending that the accident occurred due to rash and
negligent riding
of
the
rider
of
the
offending
motorcycle (No.KA 15/EJ 0519) and the rider did not
possess valid and effective driving license as on the
date of the accident and as such, the owner of the
vehicle violated the terms of the policy and as such,
sought to absolve the liability.
5.
The Tribunal on the basis of the pleadings
framed the following three issues:
<1.
Whether petitioners prove that deceased
Ramesh succumbed to injuries in RTA that
occurred on 29/01/2018 at 6-00 P.M. at APMC
gate near Alankar Bar on Hosadurga 3 Huliyar
main road in Hosadurga Town, when deceased
was riding on Hero Shine motor cycle bearing
No.KA-16-EH-7026, due to rash and negligent
riding of motor cycle bearing No.KA-16-EJ-
0519 by its rider?
- 6 -
Whether the petitioners prove that they
are legal heirs of deceased Ramesh?
Whether petitioners are entitled for the
compensation? If so, to what extent and form
whom?
What order or award?=
6.
In order to substantiate the contention of
the claimants, claimant No.1, the wife of the deceased
examined herself as PW.1 and got marked 22
documents as Exs.P-1 to P-22. On the other hand,
respondent No.2 examined Dr. Chaitra as RW.2 and
technician of Max Hospital, Shimoga as RW.2 and got
marked Exs.R-1 and R-2.
7.
The Tribunal on consideration of the oral
and documentary evidence on record held that the
accident occurred due to the rash and negligent riding
of the motorcycle bearing registration No.KA 15/EJ
0519 by its rider and also held that the claimants have
- 7 -
proved that they are the legal heirs of the deceased
Ramesh and fastened the liability on the insurance
company awarding compensation of Rs.49,77,000/-
with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from
petition till the date of deposit.
8.
Being
unsatisfied
with
the
award
of
compensation by the Tribunal, the present appeal is
preferred by the claimants. No appeal is preferred by
the insurance company.
9.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned
counsel
for
respondent
No.2/insurance
company and perused the material on record.
10. Learned counsel for the appellant, Sri
Shivakumarappa
T.C.
would
contend
that
the
compensation arrived by the Tribunal under the head
loss of dependency is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.