The present respondents No.1, 2, and 3, as plaintiffs,

have instituted a suit in O.S.No.104/2010, against the

present respondents No.4 and 5 arraigning them as

defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the Court of the learned II

Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District,

Bengaluru (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “the Trial

Court”) for the relief of specific performance with respect to

sale of an immovable property.

2. During the pendency of the suit, the present

petitioner, claiming himself as another agreement holder for

sale dated 16-05-2008 of the very same suit schedule

property in his favour by the defendants No.1 and 2, filed

an interlocutory application, i.e. I.A.No.4 under Order I Rule

10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter for

brevity referred to as “the CPC”) seeking his impleadment in

the suit as defendant No.3. The Trial Court, vide its order

24-03-2016,

rejected

the

said

interlocutory

application. Aggrieved by the same, the impleading

4

applicant (petitioner herein) in the Trial Court has preferred

this writ petition.

3. Learned

Senior

Counsel

appearing

for

the

petitioner, in his argument submitted that, the present

petitioner is a necess