SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 50110

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - BENCH AT DHARWAD
RAJU S/O SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATKA – Respondent


Petitioner is the co-owner of the property bearing

No.1475 measuring 8714 square feet situated in Saudi

Gram, Gadag. On the said property, 600 square feet is

constructed for commercial purpose and part of the same

property was given on rent to the 6th respondent namely

<Friends Association, Sudi= (for short, 8the Association9) on

lease/rent basis which was executed on 30.06.2017.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

during pendency of the lease agreement, respondent

3

No.6-tenant, who was holder of CL-4 licence was supposed

to use the said premises for the purpose of recreation

activities and serving of liquor in a separate room

exclusively to the members of the Association. But instead

of confining to the regulations and terms and conditions of

the licence issued, the 6th respondent has violated the

same in serving liquor to strangers, who are not the

members of the Association. Despite petitioner informing

this fact to the 6th respondent-tenant, he has not adhered

to follow the Rules and Regulations of licence.

3. It is further contended that he has not paid rent

for more than 03 years. Therefore, respondent No.6 is in

violation of payment of rent and has also vio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top