2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 42040
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.339 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
THE STATE3REPRESENTED BY
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, D.K.
MANGALURU, SULIA P.S. 3 574 239
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
AND:
1.
MONNAPPA GOWDA
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O RAMANNA GOWDA
2.
JAYANTH GOWDA
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O RAMANNA GOWDA
3.
VITAL GOWDA
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O RAMANNA GOWDA
4.
K. NARAYANA GOWDA
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O RAMANNA GOWDA
ALL ARE R/AT KADIR HOUSE
MRURLYA VILLAGE
SULIA TALUK, D.K. 3 574 239
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.B.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
378(1) AND (3) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO
APPEAL
AGAINST
THE
AND
ORDER
OF
ACQUITTAL DATED 24.11.2014 PASSED BY THE V ADDL.
DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANGALURU, SITTING AT
PUTTUR, D.K., IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.52/2007 IN SO FAR
AS IT RELATES TO ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 326 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED ON 24.09.2021 FOR JUDGMENT AND COMING
ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY,
M.I.ARUN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved
by
the
judgment
and
order
dated
24.11.2014 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, sitting at Puttur,
Dakshina
Kannada,
in
Criminal
Appeal
No.52/2007
acquitting the accused for the offence punishable under the
provisions of Section 326 of IPC, the State has preferred this
appeal.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred
to as per their status before the trial court.
The case of the prosecution is that on 08.12.1998 at
about 7.30 p.m. at Kadira of Murulya village, Sullia Taluk,
accused nos.1 to 4 with a common intention voluntarily
caused hurt to PW.1 3 Monappa Gowda and PW.2 3 Pergade
3
Gowda and to criminally intimidate PW.4 - Smt. Yamuna,
accused nos.2 and 3 have voluntarily caused grievous hurt
to PW.2 armed with sickles M.O.4 to M.O.6, which were
used as weapon for the offence likely to cause death and
thereby caused grievous hurt and accused no.1 voluntarily
caused hurt to PW.1 with sickle and accused no.4 caused
hurt to PW.1 with club M.O.1, which were used as deadly
weapons and thereby caused simple injuries and insulted
PW.4 by using abusive words and provoked her to commit
breach of peace and in furtherance of their common
intention criminally intimidated PW.4 by uttering the words
and giving life threat to cause hurt to her husband and
thereby committed the offences punishable under the
provisions of Section 504, 324, 326, 506 r/w 34 of IPC.
Trial took place before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and
JMFC, Sullia. In order to prove its case, the prosecution has
examined in all 12 witnesses - PWs.1 to 12 and got marked
the documents 3 Exs.P1 to Ex.P7 and material objects -
M.O.1 to M.O.6 were marked. The accused have not
examined any witnesses. The trial court, by judgment dated
23.05.2003 in C.C.No.564/1999, convicted accused nos.1 to
4 for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 324 and
4
326 r/w 34 of IPC and acquitted them for the offences
punishable under section 506(II) of IPC. Aggrieved by the
same, Criminal Appeal No.39/2003 was filed by the accused
before the Fast Track Court-I, D.K., Mangalore. The First
Appellate Court on the ground that the statement under
Section 313 of Cr.P.C was not recorded has set aside the
said judgment of the trial court and remanded the matter
back to the trial court by judgment dated 18.09.2006.
Thereafter,
by
judgment
dated
19.02.2007
in
C.C.No.564/1999, the trial court has convicted all the
accused for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and
326 r/w 34 of IPC and acquitted them for the offences under
sections 504 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC and has sentenced them
as mentioned below:
<ORDER
The accused No.1 to 4 are convicted for the
offence Under Section 324 read with 34 I.P.C. and each of
them are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a
period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in
default simple imprisonment for a further period of 2
months.
The accused No.1 to 4 are convicted for the
offence under Section 326 IPC and the accused No.1 and
4 are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a
period of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each in
default simple imprisonment for two months and accused
No.2
and
3
are
sentenced
to
undergo
rigorous
5
imprisonment for a period of two years, and to pay fine of
Rs.5,000/- each in default simple imprisonment for a
further period of two months for the said offence.
Both the sentences shall run concurrently.
Out of the fine amount a sum of Rs.15,000/- is
ordered to be paid as compensation to P.W.2 3 Pergade
Gowda and a sum o