- 1 -
CRL.A No. 2646 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2646 OF 2012 (C)
BETWEEN:
SHRINIVAS SURESH RAO SABANIS,
AGE: 30 YEARS,
OCC: VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT,
HIREBAGEWADI, TQ and DIST: BELAGAVI.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B.S.SANGATI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
POLICE INSPECTOR, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA,
BELGAUM, R/BY THE SPECILA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ANIL KALE, SPECIAL P.P.)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.374(2) OF
CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN SPECIAL CASE
NO.107/2010, ON THE FILE OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE (IV ADDL.
SESSIONS
JUDGE)
AT
BELGAUM
AND
SET-ASIDE
THE
JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED ON THE
APPELLANT DATED 16.04.2012 AND SET THE APPELLANT AT
LIBERTY.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MANJANNA
E
Digitally
signed by
MANJANNA E
- 2 -
CRL.A No. 2646 of 2012
1.
Heard Sri B.S.Sangati, learned counsel for the
appellant and Sri Anil Kale, learned Special Public Prosecutor
for respondent – State and perused the records.
2.
This Appeal is filed by the accused challenging the
Judgment
of
conviction
and
order
of
sentence
dated
16.04.2012 passed in Spl.Case No.107/2010 on the file of IV
Additional Sessions and Special Judge (PCA) at Belagavi.
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
A complaint came to be lodged by Sri Avinash
Shivaputrappa Aralikatti to Lokayukta Police, Belagavi on
02.03.2009. Based on which, Lokayukta Police registered a
case in Crime No.2/2009 for the offence punishable under
Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PC Act’, for brevity). The
complaint averments reveals that the complainant owns a land
in Hirebagewadi village bearing Sy.No.401/2 measuring 3 acres
9 guntas and in 2004, the elder brother of the complainant by
name Eranna Shivaputrappa Aralikatti had purchased the same.
Thereafter on 29.12.2008, half of the said land measuring 1
- 3 -
acre 24 guntas was gifted in favour of the complainant by a
registered gift deed. Thereafter, the complainant gave an
application to the Taluka Office for transfer of revenue entries
in the name of the complainant. The said application was
received and inserted ‘J’. ‘J’ form was also received by the
Taluka Office from the Sub-Registrar’s Office.
4.
In order to find out the fate of the said application,
the complainant contacted the appellant herein. In that regard,
the
accused-appellant
demanded
Rs.3,000/-
as
illegal
gratification. On bargain, it was freezed to a sum of Rs.2,000/-.
Same was refused by the complainant and he approached
Lokayukta Police and lodged a complaint.
5.
The Lokayukta Police after getting confirmation
about the veracity of the complaint averments secured two
independent government servants to act as panchas for the
intended trap. The Lokayukta Police also made preparations for
the intended trap and obtained Rs.3,000/- containing four
currency notes of Rs.500/- denomination from the complainant
and they noted the numbers of the said currency notes and
smeared phenolphthalein powder on the currency notes and
- 4 -
demonstrated its reaction with sodium carbonate solution in the
presence of the panchas and experimental mahazar was
conducted in the office of the Lokayukta. The signatures of the
panch
witnesses
and
complainant
were
taken
to
the
experimental mahazar. Complainant and shadow witnesses
were instructed to approach the accused and on demand to
handover the tainted currency notes to the accused and give a
pre-designated signal to the raid party. Accordingly, raid party
proceeded in the government jeep to the office of the accused
at Belagavi and they came to know that the accused had gone
to
Hirebagewadi.
Thereafter
the
raid
party
came
to
Hirebagewadi by then the accused had come back to Belagavi.
On further contact with the accused, accused told that he will
be meeting the complainant in Hotel Pranam at Belagavi.
Accordingly, the complainant and shadow witness met the
accused and gave the currency notes, which the accused kept
in his shirt pocket. Thereafter, pre-designated signal was given
to the rest of the members of the raid party and immediately
raid party came to the hotel and apprehended the accused. On
enquiry, he told that the tainted currency is in shirt pocket and
the same was seized by the raid party. Colour test was
- 5 -
conducted and the colour test stood positive. The details of the
raid has been reduced into writing in the form of trap mahazar
and thereafter, the accused was arrested and produced before
the Special Judge and from there, sent to judicial custody. The
investigation agency carried out the investigation thoroughly
and thereafter, charge sheet came to be filed against the
accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d)
r/w Section 13(2) of the P.C. Act.
6.
Presence of the accused was secured be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.