SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 53673

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT. CHANNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SIDDAPPA – Respondent


AND

DECREE

DATED

17.03.2015 PASSED IN R.A. NO.42/2012 ON THE FILE OF

THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C.,

CHITRADURGA,

DISMISSING

APPEAL

AND

CONFIRMING

JUDGMENT

AND

DECREE

DATED

12.10.2012 PASSED IN O.S. NO.20/2002 ON THE FILE OF

THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA.

3

THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED

FOR JUDGMENT ON 08.09.2022, COMING ON FOR

PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The captioned second appeal is filed by the

unsuccessful

defendant

who

has

questioned

concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts

below wherein both the Courts have declared plaintiff

as the owner of the suit schedule property and have

further declared that the sale deed dated 16.12.1989

is

a

fraudulent

and

a

void

document

and

consequently,

defendant

is

directed

to

deliver

possession of the suit schedule property in favour of

the plaintiff.

2.

For the sake of convenience, the parties

are referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.

3.

Plaintiff instituted a suit for possession.

Plaintiff also sought the relief of declaration claiming

4

that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule

property. Plaintiff specifically c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top