KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT. CHANNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SIDDAPPA – Respondent
AND
DECREE
DATED
17.03.2015 PASSED IN R.A. NO.42/2012 ON THE FILE OF
THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C.,
CHITRADURGA,
DISMISSING
APPEAL
AND
CONFIRMING
JUDGMENT
AND
DECREE
DATED
12.10.2012 PASSED IN O.S. NO.20/2002 ON THE FILE OF
THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA.
3
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR JUDGMENT ON 08.09.2022, COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The captioned second appeal is filed by the
unsuccessful
defendant
who
has
questioned
concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts
below wherein both the Courts have declared plaintiff
as the owner of the suit schedule property and have
further declared that the sale deed dated 16.12.1989
is
a
fraudulent
and
a
void
document
and
consequently,
defendant
is
directed
to
deliver
possession of the suit schedule property in favour of
the plaintiff.
2.
For the sake of convenience, the parties
are referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3.
Plaintiff instituted a suit for possession.
Plaintiff also sought the relief of declaration claiming
4
that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule
property. Plaintiff specifically c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.