2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32223
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:43996
CRL.P No. 12227 of 2023
C/W CRL.P No. 12229 of 2023
CRL.P No. 12230 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12227 OF 2023
C/W
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12229 OF 2023,
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12230 OF 2023
IN CRL.P ;NO.12227/2023:
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. TASMAEE SHETTY K
D/O SUBASHCHADNRA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/OP NO.1186,9TH CROSS
3RD MAIN, CHANDRA LAYOUT
VIJAYANGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040.
2.
VIJAYA KAPILA
S/O GIRIYAPPA GOUDA KAPILA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RA/ 1624, 1ST CROSS
OPP WATER TANK
CHANDRA LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADV.)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
GOVINDRAJA NAGAR POLICE
STATION, BENGLAURU
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by B A
KRISHNA
KUMAR
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:43996
CRL.P No. 12227 of 2023
C/W CRL.P No. 12229 of 2023
CRL.P No. 12230 of 2023
(BY SRI M.S. SHYAMSUNDAR, SPL..P.P A/W
SRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.412/2023 OF GOVINDARAJA NAGAR
P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A,304B,34 OF
IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL.C.M.M
COURT BENGALURU CITY.
IN CRL.P NO.12229/2023:
BETWEEN:
1 . GIRIYAPPA GOWDA KAPILA
S/O SUBBANNA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2 . SEETHAMMA KAPILA
W/O GIRIYAPPA KAPILA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT 1624
1ST B CROS, OPP. WAT ER TANK
CHANDRA LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI BIPIN HEGDE, ADV., FOR
SRI M.S. SHYAMSUNDAR, SPL.P.P)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
GOVINDARAJA NAGAR POLICE STATION
BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP)
- 3 -
NC: 2023:KHC:43996
CRL.P No. 12227 of 2023
C/W CRL.P No. 12229 of 2023
CRL.P No. 12230 of 2023
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER
ON
BAIL
IN
CR.NO.412/2023
REGISTERED
BY
GOVINDARAJA NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 304B, 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT ON THE FILE OF XXIV ADDL.C.M.M.,
BENGALURU.
IN CRL.P NO.12230/2023:
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJESH KAPIL
S/O GIRIYAPPA KAPILA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
RF/O NO.1186, 9TH CROSS
3RD CROSS, CHADNRA LAYOUT
VIJAYANGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI BIPIN HEGDE, ADV., FOR
SRI M.S. SHYAMSUNDAR, SPL. P.P)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY GOVINDARAJA NAGAR
POLICE STATION, BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.412/2023 OF GOVINDARAJA NAGAR
P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A,304B,34 OF
IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL.C.M.M
COURT BENGALUR CITY.
- 4 -
NC: 2023:KHC:43996
CRL.P No. 12227 of 2023
C/W CRL.P No. 12229 of 2023
CRL.P No. 12230 of 2023
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
The court held that the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail as there is no prima facie case against them.
Headnote:
BAIL - DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 - SECTION 3 & 4 - IPC - SECTION 498A & 304B - BAIL APPLICATION - Petitioners are accused nos.1 to 4 & 10 in Crime No.412/2023 registered by Govindaraja Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B, 34 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. - Petitioners are before this Court under Section 439 Cr.PC. - Petitioners are granted bail subject to conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased Aishwarya was married to accused no.10 who is the son of accused nos.1 & 2, about five years prior to the complaint. Aishwarya had completed her B.Tech and MBA Degree and was earlier working in a IT company. After the marriage, she was staying in her matrimonial house along with her in-laws. When Aishwarya was residing in the matrimonial house along with her in-laws, the accused persons used to quarrel with her on petty issues. Therefore, Aishwarya and her husband had started residing separately in a rented apartment for the last one year. The couple had no issues. It is further averred in the complaint that accused no.1 had abused Aishwarya stating that her character was not good, and therefore, had asked her not to visit her husband's factory. It is also averred that there was a demand for dowry by the accused persons constantly, and therefore unable to bear the torture and ill-treatment meted out by the accused, her daughter Aishwarya had returned to her parents house and she was residing with them for the last 20 days. On 26.10.2023 at about 4.00 p.m., when the complainant and her son returned home, they found that the front door of the house was bolted from inside. Inspite of they knocking the door, nobody opened the door, and therefore, they called Aishwarya over her mobile phone. The said call was not picked up by Aishwarya. Thereafter, the door bolt was opened by the complainant and her son with the help of a pipe and when they entered the house, they saw that Aishwarya had committed suicide in her bedroom in the first floor of the house by hanging herself to the ceiling fan using her chudidar veil. The death note which was written by Aishwarya was also recovered from the said room. The handwriting found in the death note was identified by the complainant and in the complaint, she has stated that the handwriting found in the death note was that of her daughter. Copy of the death note is made available to the court. A perusal of the same would reveal that deceased has not made any allegation against the accused persons which would prima facie attract the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Finding of the Court:
The petitioners have made out a case for grant of regular bail. Accordingly, the following order: The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.412/2023 registered by Govindaraja Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B, 34 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, subject to the following conditions:
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail?
Ratio Decidendi: The court observed that there is absolutely no averment in the death note with regard to any payment of dowry or demand for payment of dowry. There is also no allegation that the deceased was being subjected to ill-treatment and harassment by the accused in furtherance of demand for dowry. On the other hand, in the death note, the deceased has thanked her father-in-law and mother-in-law for the love extended to her. It is also stated in the death note by the deceased that her husband is a gem of person and is literally next to god and she also has stated that her final rites is required to be done by her husband and parents. In addition to the above, the material on record would go to show that deceased and her husband were staying separately in a rented apartment for the last nearly one year prior to the date of complaint. Therefore, it is very clear that they were not staying with accused nos.1 to 4 for the last one year prior to the date of complaint. The material on record would also go to show that the marriage of accused nos.3 & 4 was solemnized only on 09.02.2023. As on the said date, the deceased and her husband had already started residing separately in a rented house. Therefore, the allegation against accused nos.3 & 4 that they had ill-treated the deceased in the matrimonial house appears to be prima facie false. The complaint averments would also go to show that about 20 days prior to the date Aishwarya committed suicide, she had returned to her parents house and she was residing with them. Aishwarya has committed suicide in her parents house. It is not the case of the prosecution that any one of the accused persons had visited the house of the complainant during the said 20 days. Therefore, it becomes difficult to believe that the death note was orchestered by accused no.10. The handwriting found in the death note has been identified and the complainant has admitted that the death note is in her daughter's handwriting. Therefore, the argument addressed by the learned Special Public Prosecutor that the subsequent material collected by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation gives rise to a doubt regarding the contents and genuineness of the averments made in the death note left behind by the deceased, cannot be appreciated.
Final Decision: The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.412/2023 registered by Govindaraja Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B, 34 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, subject to the following conditions:
Accused nos.1 to 4 & 10 in Crime No.412/2023 registered
by Govindaraja Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the
offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B, 34 IPC and
Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, are before
this Court under Section 439 Cr.PC.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3.
Complainant
-
Smt.
Usha
Subramanya
W/o
Subramanya.M.S., had lodged a complaint dated 26.10.2023
before the Station House Officer of Govindaraja Nagar Police
Station, Bengaluru City, based on which, FIR in Crime
No.412/2023 was registered for the aforesaid offences against
Giriyappa Gowda and others. During the course of investigation
in the said case, accused nos.1, 3 & 10 were arrested on
02.11.2023 and accused nos.2 & 4 were arrested on
03.11.2023. Their bail applications filed before the Court of
LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City, in Crl.
- 5 -
Misc. Nos.10910/2023 & 10911/2023 were dismissed on
21.11.2023. Therefore, they are before this Court.
4.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the
death note which is the basis for filing the complaint, there is
no allegation with regard to demand of dowry nor there is any
allegation with regard to the ill-treatment and harassment in
furtherance of demand for dowry. In addition to the same, in
the death note there is absolutely no allegation as against the
husband of the deceased who is now arrayed as accused no.10
in the case. In the FIR, the husband of the deceased was not
arrayed as an accused and he was arrested along with the
other accused on 02.11.2023 itself. He submits that the death
note is admitted to be in the handwriting of the deceased. As
per the complaint averments, the deceased and her husband
were living separately for the last one year. The complaint is
lodged on 26.10.2023. The marriage of the accused nos.3 & 4
was solemnized only on 09.02.2023. Therefore, much prior to
the date of the said marriage, deceased and her husband were
residing separately, and therefore, the allegation made in the
complaint as against accused nos.3 & 4 is completely false.
Considering the averments made in the death note, the alleged
- 6 -
offences in the FIR does not get attracted against the accused
persons. Accused nos.1 & 2 are the parents of accused no.10.
Accused nos.3 & 4 are the brother and the sister-in-law of
accused no.10 and accused no.10 is the husband of deceased
Aishwarya. They are in custody for the last more than one
month. Major portion of the investigation in the case is
completed. Accordingly, he prays to allow the petition.
5.
Per contra, the Special Public Prosecutor submits that
during the course of investigation, the material collected would
give rise to a serious doubt as to whether the averments made
in the death note are correct. He submits that the death note
appears to be orchestered by accused no.10 who is the
husband of the deceased. Major portion of the investigation is
complete and when the investigation is at the last stage, if the
petitioners are granted bail, they may tamper with the
prosecution witnesses and evidence. Accordingly, he prays to
dismiss the petition.
6.
Complainant who is the mother of deceased Aishwarya
has averred in her complaint that her daughter Aishwarya was
married to accused no.10 who is the son of accused nos.1 & 2,
- 7 -
about five years prior to the complaint. Aishwarya had
completed her B.Tech and MBA Degree and was earlier working
in a IT company. After the marriage, she was staying in her
matrimonial house along with her in-laws. When Aishwarya was
residing in the matrimonial house along with her in-laws, the
accused persons used to quarrel with her on petty issues.
Therefore, Aishwarya and her husband had started residing
separately in a rented apartment for the last one year. The
couple had no issues. It is further averred in the complaint that
accused no.1 had abused Aishwarya stating that her c