SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34669

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

W.P.No.102594/2022 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

The Special Land Acquisition Officer

Upper Krishna Project

Bilagi-587 116

Dist: Bagalkot

… Petitioner

(By Smt.K.Vidyavati, AAG for

Sri.Shivaprabhu Hiremath, AGA)

AND:

1.

Annappa

S/o.Krishnappa Nalavade

Since deceased by his LRs

Smt.Chamabai

W/o.Annappa Nalavade

Occ: Household Work

R/o.Nalavade Plots

Mudhol, Dist: Bagalkot

Dead by her LR's 1B to 1H

Smt.Sonubai

W/o Balasaheb Chavan

Age: 64 years

Occ: Household Work

R/o.Jath, Dist: Sangli Maharashtra State

Pin code: 416 404

2

Smt.Shantabai

W/o.Narasappa Naroji

Dead by Lrs

2.

Santosh

S/o. Narashingarao @

Narasappa Naroji

Occ: Agril

R/o. Mudhol Dist: Bagalkot-587 313

3.

Anil

S/o. Narashingarao @

Narasappa Naroji

Occ: Agril, R/o. Mudhol

Dist: Bagalkot-587 313

4.

Sunil

S/o. Narashingarao @

Narasappa Naroji

Occ: Agril R/o. Mudhol

Dist: Bagalkot-587 313

5.

Smt.Chandrabai

D/o. Annappa Nalavade

Age: 68 years

Occ: Household Work

R/o. Nalavade Plots, Mudhol

Dist: Bagalkot- 587 313

6.

Sri.Krishna

S/o. Annappa Nalavade

Age: 68 years

Occ: Agriculture

R/o Nalavade Plots, Mudhol

Dist: Bagalkot-587 313

7.

Smt.Lata

W/o. Sadashiv Nalavade

Age: 58 Years

Occ: Household Work

R/o. Nalavade Plots, Mudhol

Dist: Bagalkot- 587 313

3

8.

Smt.Shakuntala

W/o Jyotiram Jadhav

Age:58 Years

Occ: Household Work

R/o. Islampur Tq: Wahva

Dist: Sangli Maharastra State- 416 313

… Respondents

(By Sri.S.S.Patil, Advocate)

This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India praying to issue a writ in the nature of

certiorari to quashing the order passed in E.P. No.41/2019 (LAC

No.109/2004) on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Bilagi,

Dated: 20.11.2021 vide Annexure-A and etc.

This writ petition, having been heard and reserved for

orders on 16.12.2022, coming on for pronouncement of orders,

this day, the Court made the following:

Interest is to be computed on the entire compensation amount, which comprises of three 3 components, i.e., the market value of the land, 30% solatium and 12% additional market value.

Headnote:

LAND ACQUISITION - INTEREST - CALCULATION - Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Interest is to be computed on the entire compensation amount, which comprises of three 3 components, i.e., the market value of the land, 30% solatium and 12% additional market value.

Fact of the Case:

The land loser was dissatisfied with the determination of compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer and sought for reference under Section 18 of the 1894 Act. The Civil Court after considering the matter proceeded to enhance the compensation to Rs.6,75,000/- per acre. Not being satisfied with this determination also, the land loser preferred an appeal to the High Court and the High Court enhanced the compensation further to Rs.13,93,920/-. The land loser, being dissatisfied with this compensation also, approached the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court, after hearing the parties, ultimately, enhanced the compensation Rs.23,13,600/- per acre.

Finding of the Court:

The Executing Court, thereafter, proceeded to consider both the Memo of Calculations and it came to the conclusion that the fresh calculation memo submitted by the land loser was correct and that the State was liable to pay the said amount.

Ratio Decidendi: The State has not computed interest as provided under Section 34 of the 1894 Act on the entire compensation, which comprises of the aggregate of the market value, solatium and the 12% additional market value.

Final Decision: The State is directed to pay to the land loser, Rs.3,87,45,039/-, with further interest at 15% p.a. from 28.11.2020 till the date of payment.

On 25th of January 2003, a notification under

Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for

short, "the 1894 Act") was issued. This was followed by

a declaration and ultimately an award was passed on

22nd of July 2003.

4

By this award, the market value for the lands

acquired was fixed at Rs.96,164/- per acre for irrigated

lands.

The

land

loser,

being

dissatisfied

with

determination of compensation by the Land Acquisition

Officer, sought for reference under Section 18 of the

1894 Act and the Civil Court after considering the matter

proceeded

to

enhance

the

compensation

to

Rs.6,75,000/- per acre.

Not being satisfied with this determination also, the

land loser preferred an appeal to this court and this court

enhanced the compensation further to Rs.13,93,920/-.

The

land

loser,

being

dissatisfied

with

this

compensation also, approached the Supreme Court and

the Supreme Court, after hearing the parties, ultimately,

enhanced the compensation Rs.23,13,600/- per acre.

5

As this amount awarded as compensation was not

paid, the petitioner initiated execution proceedings. In

the said execution proceedings, the land loser filed a

Memo of Calculation stating that the entire amount due

to him had not been paid. The Memo of Calculation filed

by the land loser before the Executing Court reads as

follows:

Market value fixed by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court of India, Delhi at

the Rate of Rs.26,13,600/- per acre

total extent 9A-14Gu

Rs.2,44,37,160.00

30% Solatium

Rs.73,31,148.00

12% Additional Market Value from

22-02-2003 to 22-07-2003 (151

days)

12,21,188.00

Total

Rs.3,29,89,496.00

4

Less Paid by LAO

Rs.12,13,509.00

Balance

Rs.3,17,75,987.00

5

9% Interest Per annum from 15-

09-2003

to

14-09-2004

on

Rs.3,17,75,987.00 (365 days)

Rs.28,59,838.00

6

15% Interest from 15-09-2004 to

19-02-2013 on Rs.3,17,75,987.00

(3078 days)

Rs.4,01,94,447.00

7

High Court Costs

Rs.8,85,064.00

TOTAL

Rs.7,48,30,272.00

8

Less Deposited in court including

Rs.1,60,87,451/-

+

IT

Paid

Rs.1,70,63,349.00

6

Rs.9,75,892.00

Balance

Rs.5,77,66,923.00

9

15% Interest from 20-02-2013 to

22-12-2014 on Rs.5,77,66,923/-

(670 days)

Rs.1,59,05,687.00

Total

Rs.7,36,72,610.00

10 Less Deposited in court including

Rs.2,21,98,74 + IT Paid

Rs.14,58,508/-

Rs.2,36,57,248.00

Balance

Rs.5,00,15,362.00

11 15% Interest from on

Rs.5,00,15,362/- from 23-12-2014

to 21-09-2016 (638 days)

Rs.1,31,13,616.00

Total

Rs.6,31,28,978.00

12 Less amount deposited in court

including Rs.9,82,372 + IT

Rs.10,812/-

Rs.9,93,184.00

Balance

Rs.6,21,35,794.00

13 Interest 15% on Rs.6,21,35,794/-

from 22-09-2016 to 30-10-2017

(403 days)

Rs.1,02,90,708.00

Total Balance

Rs.7,24,26,502.00

14 Less amount deposited in court

including 4,32,91,226/- + IT

30,99,986

Rs.4,63,91,212.00

Balance

Rs.2,60,35,290.00

15 Interest 15% on Rs.2,60,35,290/-

from 31-10-2017 to 27-11-2020

(1110 days)

Rs.1,18,76,372.00

Total

Rs.3,79,11,662.00

7

The State, however, disagreed with the Memo of

Calculation filed by the land loser and it proceeded to file

its own Memo of Calculation, which reads as under:

Sl.

No.

Description

Amount

Market Value fixed by as per Hon'ble

Supreme

Court

order

per

acre

Rs.26,13,600/-

A-G 09-14 SY NO.553/AP(553/A/1)

Rs.2,44,37,160/-

Less paid by LAO

Rs.8,99,133/-

Previously

amount

deposited

to

court

Rs.54,12,117/-

4

Previously

amount

deposited

to

court

Rs.67,21,902/-

5

Total difference Amount

Rs.1,14,04,008/-

6

30% solatium

Rs.34,21,202/-

7

12% Additional market value Date

on: 17-08-2000 to 28-05-2002. 151

days

Rs.5,66,139/-

8

Total compensation Amount

Rs.1,53,91,349/-

9

9% Interest From 15-09-2003 to

14-09-2004

Rs.13,85,221/-

10

15% Interest From 15-09-2004 to

11-07-2017 (No of Days 4682)

Rs.2,96,14,642/-

11

Total Interest

Rs.3,09,99,863/-

12

Gross Amount

Rs.4,63,91,212/-

13

10% TDS

Rs.30,99,986/-

14

Net Amount Payable (Deposited to

Court)

Rs.4,32,91,226/-

Thus, as could be seen from the above two sets of

calculations, the decree holder claimed that the entire

amount of compensation is yet to be paid, whereas, the

8

State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top