SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29259

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:35937

CRL.P No. 5982 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5982 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

1.

MR DAMODARA NAIDU V

SON OF V GOPALA NAIDU

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

2.

MR GOWRI V

WIFE OF DAMODARA NAIDU V

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.436

BHCS LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN

3RD CROSS, NEAR SADHANA COLLEGE

UTTARAHALLI

BENGALURU -560 061

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI PRADEEP K R, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE STATION

BENGALURU -560 061

REPRESENTED BY SPP

HIGH COURT, BENGALURU – 560 001

2.

MR RAKESH C

SON OF CHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

RESIDING AT NO.2374

GROUND FLOOR,

25TH MAIN

HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR 1

BENGALURU -560 102

Digitally

signed by R

MANJUNATHA

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:35937

CRL.P No. 5982 of 2023

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI DECLYN GOMES, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION

439(2) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE TO ALLOW THIS

PETITION AND TO REVOKE THE BAIL GRANTED TO THE

RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CRL.P.NO.1956/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 420, 468, 471 OF IPC

REGISTERED BY THE SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE STATION

WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV ACMM,

BENGALURU AND TO CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE

LXIX

ADDITIONAL

CITY

CIVIL

AND

SESSIONS

JUDGE,

BENGALURU CITY (CCH-70) IN CRL.MISC.NO.115/2023.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER

CONSIDERATION,

THIS

DAY,

THE

COURT

MADE

THE

FOLLOWING:

Learned

counsel

for

petitioners

and

counsel

for

respondents present.

Respondent No.2-Sri Rakesh C, is absent on account of

his ill health.

3.

Memo filed, memo accepted. A sum of Rs.2,60,000/-

which is the insurance claim is entitled to be received by Sri

Damodara Naidu under due identification from State Bank of

India Life Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to

as ‘Insurance Company’ for short) for which Sri Rakesh C has

no objection as he has already given letter to the Insurance

- 3 -

Company. After receipt of insurance amount, the pending civil

cases should also be brought to logical end.

4.

Sri

K.R.Pradeep,

learned

counsel

submits

that

Rs.2,60,000/- which is the insurance amount payable to Sri

Rakesh C is ordered to be withdrawn by Sri Damodara Naidu,

as Sri Rakesh has already given letter to the State Bank of

India. In view of the settlement inter se, Damodara Naidu to

receive the insurance claim in a sum of Rs.2,60,000/- from

Insurance Company, Master Policy No.70000018311 (SBI Lite-

RiNn Raksha), Member ID:603428210 dated 08.06.2022.

5.

Since the matter is inter se settled among the parties,

Rakesh C shall withdraw O.S.No.5619/2022 as settled out of

Court and is entitled to obtain refund of permissible Court Fee.

6.

Since the matter is settled inter se parties, present

petition filed by the petitioners under Section 439(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure seeking cancellation of bail has

rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the very criminal

cases initiated by the petitioners against respondent No.2 in

Criminal Petition Nos.9668/2023 and 9669/2023 stood quashed

by the Order passed by this Court dated 04.10.2023.

- 4 -

7.

Accordingly,

petition

stands

dismissed

as

having

rendered infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE

kcm

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top