SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29395

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 11998 OF 2011 (MV-I)

C/W.

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 11991 OF 2011,

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 12005 OF 2011,

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 12018 OF 2011,

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8374 OF 2016(MV-I),

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3303 OF 2017 (MV-I)

IN MFA NO.11998/2011

BETWEEN:

M. P. KUMARASWAMY,

S/O PRAHALADAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

VEGETABLE VENDOR,

MATHODU, HOSADURGA TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR B K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

SRI. KRISHNA NILAYA,

Digitally signed

by PAVITHRA B

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRI PETE,

HOSADURGA TOWN,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527.

2.

THE GENERAL MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBORD GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

ICICI BANK TOWERS,

BANDRA - KURLA COMPLEX,

MUMBAI - 400 051.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN. N. HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:29.10.2010 PASSED IN MVC

NO.68/09 ON THE FILE OF THE ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND MACT, HOSADURGA PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PETITION

FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.11991/2011

BETWEEN:

RAMAPPA,

S/O MALLAJAPPA GOVINDAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

AGRICULTURIST, AJJI KAMSAGARA VILLAGE,

HOSADURGA TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR B K., ADVOCATE)

- 3 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

AND:

1.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

SRI. KRISHNA NILAYA,

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRI PETE,

HOSADURGA TOWN,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527.

2.

THE GENERAL MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBORD GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

ICICI BANK TOWERS,

BANDRA - KURLA COMPLEX,

MUMBAI - 400 051.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYANA HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:29.10.2010 PASSED IN MVC

NO.65/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND MACT, HOSADURGA PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PETITION

FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.12005/2011

BETWEEN:

B. H. DEVARAJAPPA @ DEVARAJ,

- 4 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

S/O HANUMANTHAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

AGRICULTURIST, MATHODU VILLAGE,

HOSADURGA TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR B. K., ADVOCATE AND

SRI. V. N. JAGADEESH., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

SRI. KRISHNA NILAYA,

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRI PETE,

HOSADURGA TOWN,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527.

2.

THE GENERAL MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBORD GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

ICICI BANK TOWERS,

BANDRA - KURLA COMPLEX,

MUMBAI - 400 051.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:29.10.2010 PASSED IN MVC

NO.74/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL

- 5 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

JUDGE AND MACT, HOSADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PETITION

FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.12018/2011

BETWEEN:

PATHAIAH @ PATHAPPA,

S/O NINGAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

AGRICULTURIST,

BARAGENAGALLY VILLAGE,

HOSADURGA TALUK,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR B. K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

SRI. KRISHNA NILAYA,

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRI PETE,

HOSADURGA TOWN,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527.

2.

THE GENERAL MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBORD GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

- 6 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

ICICI BANK TOWERS,

BANDRA - KURLA COMPLEX,

MUMBAI - 400 051.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN. N. HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:29.10.2010 PASSED IN MVC

NO.90/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND MACT, HOSADURGA PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM

PETITION

FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.8374/2016

BETWEEN:

NEELAMMA,

W/O RANGASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

OCC: PRESENTLY NIL,

R/O GOSAGARA, CHIKNAYAKANAHALLI TALUK,

R/O 1ST CROSS, NITTUVALLI,

DAVANAGERE - 577 001.

…APPELLANT

(BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., ADVOCATE)

- 7 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

AND:

1.

G. H. BAHDRAPPA,

S/O HALAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

R/O KONASAGAR,

MALAKALMURU TALUK,

CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

2.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

MAJOR,

OCC: TRANSPORT BUSINESS,

R/O SHRIKRISHNA NILAYA,

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRIPET,

HOSADURGA,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501.

3.

THE MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBARD, GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

ZENITH HOUSE, KESHAVRAO KHADE MARG,

MAHALAKSHMI,

MUMBAI - 400 034.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN. N. HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R2;

SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:25.06.2012 PASSED IN MVC

NO.350/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR

- 8 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

CIVIL JUDGE, AND VI ADDITIONAL MACT, DAVANAGERE,

PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION

AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

IN MFA NO.3303/2017

BETWEEN:

BRANCH MANAGER,

ICICI LOMBARD GIC LTD.,

ZENITH HOUSE, KESHAVRAO KHADE MARG,

MAHALAKSHMI,

MUMBAI - 400 034.

NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,

GENERAL MANAGER,

M/S ICICI LOMBARD GIC LTD.,

NO.89, II FLOOR, SVR COMPLEX,

HOSUR MAIN ROAD,

KORAMANGALA,

MADIVALA, BANGALORE - 68.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

NEELAMMA,

W/O RANGASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

R/A GOSAGARA, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK,

NOW R/AT 1ST CROSS, NITTUVALLI,

DAVANAGERE - 577 001.

- 9 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

2.

G. H. BAHDRAPPA,

S/O HALLAPPA,

NOW AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

R/O KONASAGAR,

MOLAKALMURU,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 535.

3.

M. K. RAGHAVENDRA,

AGED MAJOR,

S/O M. KRISHNAMURTHY,

R/AT SHRIKRISHNA NILAYA,

DOOR NO.1550, KOBRIPET,

HOSADURGA - 577 527,

CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN. N. HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R3;

SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

NOTICE NOT ORDERED TO R2)

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:25.06.2012 PASSED IN MVC

NO.350/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR

CIVIL JUDGE AND VI ADDITIONAL MACT AT DAVANGERE,

AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 5,77,810/- ALONG WITH

INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF

PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION.

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS

DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

- 10 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24670

MFA No. 11998 of 2011

C/W MFA No. 11991 of 2011

MFA No. 12005 of 2011

MFA No. 12018 of 2011

MFA No. 8374 of 2016

MFA No. 3303 of 2017

MFA Nos.11998/2011, 11991/2011, 12005/2011 and

12018/2011 are filed by the claimants under Section 173(1) of

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'MV Act' for

short) challenging the common judgment and award passed in

MVC Nos.68/2009, 65/2009, 74/2009 and 90/2009 respectively

dated 29.10.2010, on the file of the Itinerary Senior Civil Judge

& MACT, Hosadurga, questioning the liability fixed on the owner

of the bus as well as seeking enhancement of compensation.

MFA No.8374/2016 is filed by the claimant under

Section 173(1) of MV Act, challenging the judgment and award

passed in MVC No.350/2008 dated 25.06.2012, on the file of

the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge & VI Addl. MACT, Davanagere,

seeking enhancement of compensation.

MFA No.3303/2017 is filed by the Insurance

Company challenging the above said judgment and award

passed in MVC No.350/2008 dated 25.06.2012, questioning the

liability fixed on the Insurance Company.

- 11 -

4.

The brief facts of the case are that on 01.12.2007

at about 3.45 p.m., the appellants/claimants were traveling in a

Bus bearing Reg. No.KA-16/A-2637 as passengers from

Mathodu towards Hosadurga. When the bus reached near

Ajjikamsagara Vilage, the driver of the bus drove the same in a

rash and negligent manner and due to which, the bus toppled

down to its right. Due to the impact, the appellants/claimants

sustained simple and grievous injuries all over their body.

Therefore, the appellants/claimants preferred claim petitions

under Section 166 of MV Act, seeking compensation.

5.

Heard the arguments on both sides and perused the

records.

6.

The

appeals

in

MFA

No.11998/2011

(MVC

No.68/2009), MFA No.11991/2011 (MVC No.65/2009), MFA

No.12005/2011 (MVC No.74/2009) and MFA No.12018/2011

(MVC No.90/2009) are pertaining to MACT, Hosadurga. In

these four appeals, the Tribunal held that the driver of the bus

did not have driving license to drive the heavy passengers

- 12 -

vehicle but only was having driving license to drive the light

motor vehicle but the vehicle involved is heavy passengers

vehicle bus. Hence, there is a violation of condition of

insurance policy. Hence, fastened the liability on the owner of

the bus. In these four appeals, upon perusal of the trial Court

records, Exs.R8 & R9 are the driving license particulars of the

driver of the bus, in which, it can be found that the driver was

holding driving license to drive the light motor vehicle only.

Hence, on these basis, the Tribunal has fastened the liability on

the owner of the bus.

7.

The

appeals

in

MFA

No.8374/2016

(MVC

No.350/2008) and MFA No.3303/2017 (MVC No.350/2008) are

pertaining to MACT, Davanagere. In these two cases, the

Tribunal held that the driver was holding driving license to drive

the heavy passengers vehicle and the vehicle in question

involved is bus which is heavy passengers vehicle. Accordingly,

the Tribunal has fastened the liability on the Insurance

Company.

- 13 -

8.

Before

the

MACT,

Hosadurga

and

MACT,

Davanagere, the cases are pertaining to the same accident

involving the same bus, same owner and insurance company

but there are two different findings by two different MACTs and

has taken different view regarding whether the driver of the

bus was holding driving license or not. When the bus involved

in the accident, driver, owner and insurance company are same

and all the claim petitions are arising out of the same accident

but there are two different findings on the driving license viz.,

the MACT, Hosadurga has held that the driver of the bus was

not holding the driving license to drive heavy passengers

vehicle but only was having driving license to drive light motor

vehicle, but, the MACT, Davanagere has held that the driver of

the bus was holding driving license to drive heavy passengers

vehicle.

9.

Learned counsel for the Insurance Company is

contending that there are two driving licenses extract issued by

RTO, Sirsi and RTO, Chitradurga but the driving license extract

furnished

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top