2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29831
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:37543
CRL.P No. 9709 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9709 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
VIJAYA KUMAR,
S/O DASE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
ARALIMARA CIRCLE,
LAGGERE,
BENGALURU - 560 062.
AND
CHENNAPURA BEGUR POST,
KITTANAGAMANGALA,
KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A.N. RADHA KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY TAVAREKERE POLICE,
REPRESENTED BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)
Digitally signed
by NANDINI
MS
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:37543
CRL.P No. 9709 of 2023
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
ENLARGE
HIM
ON
BAIL
IN
(CRI.NO.363/2010)
S.C.NO.47/2023,
ON
THE
FILE
OF
THE
LEARNED
III
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA,
FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 302, 394 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Accused No.3 in S.C.No.47/2023, pending before the
Court of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara,
arising out of Cr.No.363/2010, registered by Tavarakere police
station, Bengaluru South Taluk for the offences punishable
under sections 302, 394 r/w 34 IPC is before this Court under
section 439 Cr.P.C.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3.
On
the
basis
of
the
complaint
by
Sri. Chandrashekar, S/o. C. Nagaraju, on 08.08.2020, FIR in
Crime No.363/2010 was registered by Tavarakere police,
Bengaluru South Taluk against unknown persons for the
offence punishable under section 302 IPC. During the course of
investigation of the said case, the petitioner was arrested and
after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed as
against four persons for the aforesaid offences and the
- 3 -
petitioner was arrayed as accused No.3 in the charge sheet. In
the said case, the petitioner was granted regular bail by the
Presiding
Officer,
Fast
Track
Court,
Ramanagara
in
Crl.Misc.No.813/2010, which was disposed of on 21.01.2011.
Before the committal court, since the petitioner had not
appeared, case against him was split up and as against other
accused, the same was committed to the jurisdictional Sessions
Court and was numbered as S.C.No.124/2012 before the Court
of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara. The
Committal court had issued NBW and proclamation order
against the petitioner herein and his presence was secured on
16.02.2023 and the split up case against him was committed to
the Sessions Court on 02.03.2023 and is numbered as
S.C.No.47/2023. His bail application filed before the Court of III
Addl.
District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Ramanagara
in
Crl.Misc.No.666/2023 was rejected on 31.08.2023. Therefore,
he is before this Court.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on
merits of the matter, the petitioner was already granted regular
bail. Only on the ground that he had not appeared before the
committal court, the committal court had issued NBW against
- 4 -
him and his presence was secured. The split up case as against
other accused is also pending consideration before the
jurisdictional Sessions Judge. The petitioner who is arrested is
now in custody from 16.02.2023 onwards. Except the present
case, he has no other criminal case. Accordingly, he has prayed
to allow the petition.
5.
Per-contra,
learned
HCGP
opposed
the
bail
application and she submits that the petitioner has not
appeared before the Court for a period of eleven years and
therefore, prays to dismiss the petition.
6. The material on record would go to show that the
charge sheet in the present case is filed as against four persons
and initially, FIR was registered against unknown persons. The
main case in S.C.No.124/2012 is said to be still pending before
the
jurisdictional
Sessions
Court
at
Ramanagara.
The
petitioner's case is also now committed to the Sessions Court
and numbered as S.C.No.47/2023. Undisputedly, the petitioner
was granted regular bail on merits of the case earlier. For the
reason that he had not appeared before the committal court,
steps were taken to secure his presence and on 16.02.2023, he
- 5 -
was produced before the Court and remanded to judicial
custody. For the mistake of not appearing regularly before the
Court, committed by the petitioner, he has already been
sufficiently punished. The other accused persons are said to be
enlarged on bail in the main case. Under the circumstances, I
am of the view that the petitioner's prayer for grant of regular
bail is required to be answered in the affirmative. Accordingly,
the following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be
enlarged on bail in S.C.No.47/2023 pending on the file of
learned III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara in
Crime No.363/2010 of Tavarakere Police Station registered for
the offences punishable under Sections 302, 394 r/w 34 of IPC,
subject to the following conditio