1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6990 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
MRS. BARGAVI K.N.,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
D/O K.NALLA THANDAPANI
@ K.NALLA DANDAPANI,
W/O B.SANTHOSH,
# BARGAVI NILAYA, GROUND FLOOR,
RAJENDRA NAGAR (ENTRANCE),
SHIVAMOGGA.
…APPELLANT
[BY SRI K.R.KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE (PH) ]
AND:
MR. SANTHOSH N.,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
S/O K. NALLA THANDAPANI
@ K. NALLA DANDAPANI,
R/O SANTHOSH NILAYA, 7TH CROSS,
RAVINDAR NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA.
…RESPONDENT
[BY SRI. SHOWRI H.R., ADVOCATE (PH)]
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43
RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
06.09.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 AND 7 IN O.S.NO.41/2022 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., SHIVAMOGGA, REJECTING
THE I.A.NO.1 THE FILED ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF
CPC AND ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.7 FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 5
R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC.
2
THIS
APPEAL
HAVING
BEEN
HEARD
AND
RESERVED
FOR
JUDGMENT ON 13.12.2022, THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE
FOLLOWING:
Challenging order dated 06.09.2022 passed by Principal
Senior Civil Judge and CJM., Shivamogga, on I.As.no.1 and 7 in
O.S.no.41/2022, this appeal is filed.
2.
Appellant herein was plaintiff, while respondent was
defendant.
3.
O.S.no.41/2022 was filed seeking for decree of partition
of plaintiff’s half share in all schedule ‘A’ and ‘B’ properties; for
direction to defendant to furnish accounts, income derive and for
share in mesne profits and also for permanent injunction restraining
defendant from entering into cheni agreement with third person to
reap crop or reap and sell areca-nut without consent of plaintiff etc.
Schedule
‘A’
included
immovable
properties
comprising
of
residential sites, agricultural land (including areca-nut and coconut
garden land), shop premises etc.; while schedule ‘B’ movable
properties included gold and silver ornaments/article etc.
3
4.
In said suit, plaintiff filed I.A.no.I under Order XXXIX
Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, seeking following prayer:
"to RESTRAIN The defendant from entering
into any cheni agreement with third persons to
reap the crop OR reap and selling the crop of the
suit schedule arecanut garden lands without the
presence and written consent of the plaintiff by an
Order OF AD-INTERIM EX PARTE TEMPORARY
INJUNCTION till the disposal of the suit on
allowing this I.A. with cost in the ends of justice."
5.
In affidavit filed in support of said application, it was
stated that Sri K.Nalla Thandapani @ K.Nalla Dandapani during his
lifetime had acquired items no.1 to 11 of suit properties out of his
earnings, therefore they were his self-acquired properties. It was
further stated that said Sri K.Nalla Thandapani died intestate
leaving behind plaintiff and defendant as his only Class-I heirs,
therefore, they were having half share each in suit properties.
6.
It
was
further
stated
that
Smt.Thilothame
was
possessing items no.12 to 16 of suit schedule and other land in
Sy.no.6/1P1
of
Kadadakatte
village,
measuring
32
guntas,
Sy.no.69/P2, measuring 02 acres 24 guntas and Sy.no.73/1
measuring 12.5 guntas of Jedikatte village. It was stated that she
4
bequeathed said lands in favour of plaintiff under registered Will
dated 03.12.2015 and after her death plaintiff had succeeded to
said property which were her exclusive property. It was also stated
that insofar as items no.12 to 16, there was no testament,
therefore plaintiff and defendant were entitled for half share each in
said properties.
7.
Insofar as items no.17 to 25, it was stated that they
were ancestral properties and as there was no partition, both
plaintiff and defendant entitled for half share each. It was stated
that said properties fetch annual income of atleast Rs.1,50,000/-. It
was further asserted that items no.26 and 27 were under adverse
possession of their mother - Smt.N.Thilothame, but, after her death
though plaintiff and defendant were in joint possession, defendant
alone had harvested crop and was not sharing income with plaintiff.
8.
It was further stated that during lifetime of parents due
to misbehavior of defendant and his wife including assault, their
father Sri K.Nalla Thandapani had lodged complaint with Jayanagar
Police Station, Shivamogga. Defendant was later sent out of house
in July, 2019, since then defendant was living away from parents.
5
It was stated that at time of death of parents, there were standing
crops and arecanut in deposit apart from cash deposits in relation
to which P & SC no.3/2021 was filed before II Additional Senior Civil
Judge, Shivamogga. With mutual consent, Succession Certificate
was issued in joint names of plaintiff and defendant. Thereafter,
they got transferred said amount to their names by sharing it.
9.
It was further alleged that defendant was collecting
rental income in respect of items no.13, 17 and 14 apart from cash
of Rs.54,78,460/- held by Sri. K.Nalla Thandapani at time of his
death. Thereafter, when plaintiff and defendant were supposed to
apply for change o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.