- 1 -
CCC No. 100115 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100115 OF 2023.
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAVI S. NAYANAR S/O. SUBRAMANYA,
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: EX. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT,
R/AT: POST. TQ. YELLAPUR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA 581359
…COMPLAINANT.
(BY SRI. GOURI SHANKAR MOT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
SIRSI SUB-DIVISION AND OTHERS,
DIST. UTTAR KANNADA 581401.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR,
AT AND POST YALLAPUR,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581359.
…ACCUSED.
(SMT. VIDYAVATI M. K, AND
SRI. V. S. KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R3).
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PLEASED TO EXERCISE ITS
JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION, 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS
ACT
AND
TO,
INITIATE
THE
PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST
THE
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER UNDER
THE PROVISIONS OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR DISOBEYING
THE ORDER DATED 16/01/2023 PASSED BY THE SINGLE JUDGE IN
W.P.NO.105406/2021 (S-DIS), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
MOHANKUMAR
B SHELAR
Digitally signed by
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR
Location: High Court of
Karnataka, Dharwad
Date: 2023.06.12 11:51:00
+0530
- 2 -
CCC No. 100115 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
S.G.PANDIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
This
contempt
petition
is
filed
alleging
the
disobedience of the order dated 16.01.2023 in Writ
Petition No.105406/2021, wherein, this Court quashed the
order dated 19.06.2015 and extended the benefit granted
to the petitioner in Writ Petition No.100961/2018 dated
14.10.2021. In terms of the said order, the respondents
were required to reinstate the complainant into service as
a Gram Sahayak.
Learned AAG files memo dated 05.06.2023
enclosing office order bearing No.Sibbandi/Viva/106/2014-
15 dated 05.06.2023, wherein, the complainant is
reinstated as Gram Sahayak.
3.
The said memo along with office order dated
05.06.2023 is taken on record. Learned counsel for the
complainant would not dispute the compliance.
- 3 -
4.
In view of the compliance of the order by re-
instating the complainant, no further proceedings would
survive.
Accordingly, the further proceeding is dropped.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SVH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.