2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30758
- 1 -
CP No. 286 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
CIVIL PETITION NO. 286 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SMT. SANGEETHA PRIYA,
D/O. MALLIKARJUN,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.449,
9TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS,
SRINIVASANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 085.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. SUDEENDRA PRASAD M P,
S/O. PURUSHOTHAM,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 3305, CHETHAN NILAYA,
5TH CROSS, BHOVI COLONY,
NEHARU NAGAR,
MANDYA DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M D RAGHUNATH., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by SANJEEVINI
JAIWANTH
KARISHETTY
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
CP No. 286 of 2022
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF CPC,
PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER TO TRANSFER OF M.C.PETITION
NO. 80/2018 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE PRL.
SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT MANDYA TO THE FAMILY COURT
AT BENGALURU IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is preferred by the wife seeking transfer of
matrimonial proceedings filed by the respondent-husband in
MC.No.80/2018 filed for dissolution of marriage pending on the
file of Senior Civil Judge and CJM at Mandya to the Family
Court at Bangalore.
2. It is the contention of learned counsel for petitioner
that the wife has preferred a petition under Section 125 of
Cr.P.C for maintenance of herself in Crl.Mis.No.296/2019
pending before the Family Court at Bangalore. Petitioner has
also filed a petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act at
Bangalore so also a compliant is filed under Domestic Violence
Act which is also pending at Bangalore before II MMTC
Bangalore. It is the further contention of learned counsel for
- 3 -
petitioner that the petition preferred by the husband is at
Mandya. He further contends that since the petitioner is not
having any source of income, she has to depend on her
widowed mother and she would also incur huge expenditure on
her stay, accommodation and food, to appear for the Court
proceedings at Mandya. Therefore, it would cause difficulty and
hardship to the wife to travel from Bangalore to Mandya.
Hence, she seeks to transfer the petition filed by the husband
before the Family Court at Mandya to the Family Court at
Bengaluru.
3. Since the petition filed by the wife under Section 125
of Cr.PC in Crl.Misc.No.296/2019 is pending before the Family
Court at Bangalore along with M.C No.3408/2018 and another
case in Crl.Misc. No.124/2018 under Section 12 of Domestic
Violence Act at II MMTC, Bangalore, I do not find any legal
impediment to transfer the case pending before the Family
Court at Mandya in MC.No.80/2018 to the Family Court at
Bangalore for adjudication. It is also apparently seen that less
amount of hardship would be caused to the respondent-
husband in traveling to Bangalore to attend the aforesaid cases
- 4 -
rather than the wife attending the case at Mandya preferred by
the
respondent-husband
seeking
divorce.
Accordingly,
I
proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
i)
Petition is allowed;
ii)
The matrimonial proceedings in MC.No.80/2018
filed under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955 pending on the file of Senior
Civil Judge and CJM at Mandya, is ordered to be
transferred to the Family Court at Bangalore and
the
same
shall
be
tried
along
with
Cri.Misc.No.296/2019, which is preferred by the
wife pending on the file of the Family Court at
Bangalore.
Sd/-
JUDGE
VS
STK