HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
G.NARENDAR,S RACHAIAH
SRI. SRINIVASA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Government Advocate.
The instant writ petition is preferred on
25.08.2022 impugning the order dated 25.04.2016, which,
in turn, came to be filed impugning the punishment
imposed on the petitioner under Order dated 05.05.2006
and affirmed in Appeal on 22.01.2007.
3.
We have perused the pleadings. There is
absolutely not even a whisper justifying the extra-ordinary
delay. The punishment is of stoppage of two annual
increments with cumulative effect. Yet the petitioner
appears to have slept over his rights and has been
indolent in not only approaching this Court, but the
original
authority
i.e.
the
Karnataka
Administrative
Tribunal.
- 3 -
4.
In that view of the matter, petition is vitiated by
delay and laches and is accordingly, rejected.
In view of disposal of the petition, I.A. 1/2022 for
dispensation does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
CHS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.