SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36034

- 1 -

RFA No. 1497 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

AND

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BASAVARAJA

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1497 OF 2016 (MON)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. D.V. NARASIMHAN,

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

S/O LATE DEVATHA

VENKATARATHNAM SETTY,

R/AT NO. 20, IV CROSS,

SHANKARAPURAM

BENGALURU - 560 004.

AND NOW AT C/O. 117,

JUMMA MASJID ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 002.

2.

SMT. D N SHAMALA DEVI,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

W/O D.V. NARASIMHAN,

R/AT NO. 20, IV CROSS,

SHANKARAPURAM,

BENGALURU - 560 004.

AND NOW AT C/O. 117,

Digitally signed

by RAMYA D

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

- 2 -

RFA No. 1497 of 2016

JUMMA MASJID ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 002.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. H.C. RAVEENDRANATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND:

1.

M/S N.S. RAJAGOPAL AND CO.,

REGISTRED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,

CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE STREET,

BENGALURU - 560 002.

REP BY ITS PARTNER,

SRI. N. SURENDRANATH,

HINDU, AGED BOUT 54 YEARS,

S/O N.S. RAJAGOPAL.

2.

SUDHA SILK TRADERS,

A PARTNERSHIP FIRM

CARRYING ON BUSINESS

IN SILK TRADING,

AT NO. 117,

JUMMA MASJID ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 002.

REP. BY ITS PARTNER

3.

SRI. D.T. SRINIVASAN,

HINDU, MAJOR,

S/O THIMMARAYA SHETTY,

R/AT NO. 2024, 9TH "A" MAIN,

II BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,

BANGALORE - 560 011.

4.

SMT. D.S. KUMARI,

HINDU, MAJOR,

W/O. D.T. SRINIVASAN

R/AT NO. 2024,

9TH 'A' MAIN, II BLOCK,

- 3 -

RFA No. 1497 of 2016

JAYANAGAR,

BANGALORE - 560 011.

5.

SRI. D.N. SHASHIDHAR

HINDU, MAJOR,

S/O D.V. NARASIMHAN,

R/AT NO. 355,

II MAIN, 4TH B CROSS,

5TH BLOCK, BSK-III-STAGE,

BENGALURU - 560 011.

6.

SMT. ARCHANA SHASHIDHAR

HINDU, MAJOR,

W/O D.N. SHASHIDHAR,

R/AT NO. 355,

II MAIN, 4TH 'B' CROSS,

5TH BLOCK, BSK-III-STAGE,

BENGALURU - 560 011.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. V.B. SHIVA KUMAR,ADVOCATE)

THE RFA FILED UNDER SEC. 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI

RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE

DATED 3.6.2016 PASSED IN O.S NO.5544/2003 ON THE FILE

OF XXXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR MONEY.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Headnote:

Final Decision: Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

None appears for the appellants even in the second

call.

- 4 -

Memo has been filed on 06.04.2022 seeking

leave to withdraw this appeal and for refund of Court fee.

Leave granted, this appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Registry shall refund the Court fee to the

appellants in accordance with law.

In view of disposal of this appeal, pending

interlocatory applications, if any, do not survive and they

stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

LL

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top