CRL.A No. 1025 of 2021
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1025 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
PEER KHAN
S/O. MOHAMEMD KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
OCC: LABOURER,
R/O. KUNDURU, MUSLIM CAMP VILLAGE,
TALUKA SAGAR,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT,
PIN – 577 401.
(NOW IN JC, DHARWAD CENTRAL PRISON,
DHARWAD,
DHARWAD DISTRICT – 580 001.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI N.R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY SAGAR RURAL POLICE,
SAGAR, REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT BENGALURU – 560 001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI VIJAY KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2)
CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS
HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
DATED 17.03.2015 PASSED IN S.C.NO.123/2013, PASSED BY FAST
Digitally signed
by SHYAMALA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
CRL.A No. 1025 of 2021
-2-
TRACK COURT AT SAGAR CONVICTING THE APPELLANT FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 302 OF IPC SENTENCING HIM TO REMAIN IN
PRISON UNTIL HIS DEATH AND TO PAY FINE OF RS.5,000/- ID SI
FOR 3 MONTHS BY SENTENCE DATED 18.03.2015 AND TO ACQUIT
HIM FROM THE CHARGES.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING
THIS DAY, K.S. HEMALEKHA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
The accused has preferred the present appeal against
the impugned judgment of conviction dated 17/03/2015 and
order
of
sentence
dated
18/03/2015
passed
in
S.C.No.123/2013, on the file of the Fast Track Court at
Sagar, convicting the accused under the provisions of
Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC” for
short) to undergo imprisonment for life i.e., he has to remain
in prison until his death and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and
in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
Facts of the case:
2.
It is the case of the prosecution that, on the basis
of the complaint lodged by the brother of the deceased –
Hasmath Banu that on 28/10/2013 at about 10.30 a.m.
Riyazkhan telephoned the complainant and informed that his
-3-
father Peerkhan-accused had committed murder of his sister
Hasmath Banu by assaulting her with sickle and spade and
when the complainant went there at 11.00 a.m., he found
the dead body of his sister in kitchen in the pool of blood and
spade and broken sickle were lying near the dead body. It is
stated that the complainant came to know that the said
Peerkhan-accused had been to Bengaluru on 19/01/2013
and stayed there for two days in the house of Fairozkhan and
returned on 23/01/2013 along with Hasmath Banu saying
that he is going to send rice with her. After two days, when
Hasmath Banu told Peerkhan that she wants to return back
to Bengaluru, he asked her to stay back so that he has to
arrange for rice and the said Peerkhan was abusing Hasmath
Banu as she was married to Fairozkhan (son of Peerkhan)
and ruined the family life of his first wife-Rihana Banu
(daughter-in-law of Peerkhan) and her children. As the first
wife of Fairozkhan namely, Rihana Banu had attempted to
commit suicide along with her children, Firozkhan was
-4-
abusing Hasmath Banu saying that she was the cause for
spoiling his son’s and daughter-in-law’s life.
3.
According to complainant, Riyazkhan mentioned
that on 27/01/2013, at around 10.00 p.m. Hasmath Banu
and her mother-in-law Rajiya Bi were sleeping in the kitchen
and at about 1.30 to 2.00 a.m., when he heard the noise, he
woke up and switched on the light and saw that the front
door was opened and when he came out, he saw his father
Peerkhan proceeding on his TVS bike and when Riyazkhan
enquired with his father, he got angry and proceeded
towards Shikaripura and when he entered the kitchen, he
found the dead body of Hasmath Banu, who had sustained
grievous injury on her head and there were spade and sickle
lying near the dead body and his mother-in-law was in
shock. On enquiry with Rajiya Bi, she informed that she
heard the noise and woke up and saw that the said Peerkhan
had kept the sickle and went out and had committed the
murder of Hasmath Banu by assaulting her on her head. The
said Peerkhan had ill-will against Hasmath Banu as he felt
-5-
that she had ruined the family of his son Fairozkhan with his
first wife and children and due to the said reason, he had
committed the murder of Hasmath Banu.
4.
On the basis of the complaint, the Jurisdictional
Police registered a case in P.S.Crime No.39/2013 and
conducted investigation by visiting the spot in the presence
of panchas and recorded the statement of the witnesses.
5.
MOs.8 to 11 were received by the Investigating
Officer and arrested the accused and recorded his voluntary
statement before the panchas and on the basis of which, he
went to Shikaripura and seized TVS moped and zerkin in the
presence of the panchas after receipt of the property extract
of the spot, P.M. report and other documents and he
concluded the investigation and submitted the charge sheet
before the Court. After filing of the charge sheet cognizance
was taken and the case was registered. Charge was framed
and explained to the accused in the language known to him
for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The
-6-
prosecution has examined fourteen witnesses and got
marked Exs.P-1 to P-34 and MOs.1 to 12.
6.
The statement
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.