2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36695
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA
SMT. BUDDI VIJAYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/11251/2022
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 11251 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11251 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. BUDDI VIJAYA
W/O LATE MAJJALINGAM
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/A VANTHADAPALLI VILLAGE
JARALA POST
GUDE MANDALA
VISHAKHAPATTANAM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE-531111
2.
SMT GUNDERI PUSHPA
W/O SUBBARAO
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/A KOTHA GUDAM VILLAGE
G K BEEDI MANDALA
R V NAGAR POST
VISHAKHAPATTANAM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE-531133
3.
SMT BUDI DEVI @ DEVI
W/O CHINNARAO
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
R/A NEELAVARAM VILLAGE
GANDE MANDALA
VISHAKHAPATTANAM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE-531133
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MALLESHA .V, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
NAYANA S
Location: High
Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 11251 of 2022
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY VIVEK NAGAR POLICE STATION
BENGALURU-560095
REPT BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. RAHUL RAI, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.93/2022 OF VIVEK NAGAR
P.S.,
BANGALORE
FOR
THE
OFFENCE
P/U/S
8(c),20(ii)(b),22(C),23(C),27-A OF NDPS ACT ON THE FILE OF
THE XXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
SPECIAL JUDGE, (NDPS), BANGALORE (CCH-33) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioners-accused Nos.8, 9 and 10 are before
this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. in Crime No.93/2022 of Viveknagar Police Station,
pending on the file of XXXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions
Judge & Spl. Judge(NDPS), Bengaluru (CCH-33) registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(C),
27(a), 20(ii)(B) and 23(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and
- 3 -
CRL.P No. 11251 of 2022
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’),
on the basis of the first information lodged by the
informant Deepak.R.
2.
Heard Sri.Mallesha.V, learned Counsel for the
petitioners and Sri.K.Rahul Rai, learned High Court
Government Pleader for the respondent -State. Perused
the materials on record.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted
that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.8 to 10.
They are innocent and have not committed any offences
as alleged. They have been falsely implicated in the matter
without any basis. They were apprehended on 24.09.2022
and since then they are in judicial custody. The allegations
against accused Nos.8, 9 and 10 is that they were found in
possession of about 3 kgs of ganja each, which is of
intermediate quantity. These petitioners are stated to be
the carriers of the contraband at the instance of the other
accused. Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of NDPS Act is not at all
- 4 -
CRL.P No. 11251 of 2022
applicable against these petitioners. The petitioners are
the permanent residents of the addresses mentioned in
the cause title to the petition and are ready and willing to
abide by any of the conditions that would be imposed by
this Court. Hence, he prays to allow the petition.
4.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader opposing the petition submitted that serious
allegations are made against the petitioners for having
committed the offences. The petitioners and other accused
have committed the offences. Initially, on credible
information,
accused
No.1
was
apprehended
and
commercial quantity of contraband was seized at his
instance and thereafter accused Nos.7 to 10 were
apprehended and from their possession 8 kg of hashish oil
and 10 kgs of ganja were recovered. Therefore, it is clear
that commercial quantity of hashish oil and intermediate
quantity of ganja were recovered from accused Nos.7 to
10 and it was a joint recovery. The rigor of Section 37(2)
- 5 -
CRL.P No. 11251 of 2022
of the Act is very much applicable to the facts of the case
as the