SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C KRISHNIAH CHETTY AND SONS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DEEPALI COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
COMAP 61/2021



COM.APPEAL.61/2021

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.61/2021

BETWEEN:

C.KRISHNIAH CHETTY & SONS PRIVATE LIMITED

AN INDIAN COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

CIN: U27205KA1979PTC003692

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

35, COMMERCIAL STREET

BENGALURU-560 001.

AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT

THE TOUCHSTONE, A BLOCK

3-3/1 MAIN GUARD CROSS ROAD

BENGALURU-560 001.

REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

SRI S.A.SURESH

S/O SRI A.S.ARUNACHALAM.

… APPELLANT

(BY SRI.AMIT SIBAL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI SIVARAMAN VAIDYANATHAN, ADV.)

AND:

1.

DEEPALI COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED

AN INDIAN COMPANY INCORPORATED

UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

CIN: U03691K1982PTCOO4687

35, COMMERCIAL STREET

R

COM.APPEAL.61/2021

2

BENGALURU-560 001

REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR

SRI C.GANESH NARAYAN

S/O LATE SRI C.V.NARAYAN.

2.

SRI C.GANESH NARAYAN

S/O LATE SRI C.V.NARAYAN

INDIAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

RESIDING AT 2A, NITESH MAYFAIR

KASTURBA CROSS ROAD

BENGALURU-560 001.

3.

SMT.C.VALLI NARAYAN

W/O LATE SRI C.V.NARAYAN

INDIAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS

RESIDING AT 44 OSBORNE ROAD

ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 042.

4.

SMT.VIDYA NATARAJ

W/O SRI C.GANESH NARAYAN

INDIAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

RESIDING AT 2A, NITESH MAYFAIR

KASTURBA CROSS ROAD

BENGALURU-560 001.

5.

BLUESTONE JEWELLERY &

LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED

AN INDIAN COMPANY INCORPORATED

UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956

CIN: U72900KA2011PTC059678

SITE NO.89/2, LAVA KUSHA ARCADE

MUNNEKOLAL VILLAGE

OUTER RING ROAD,

MARATHALLI

BENGALURU-560 037.

REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

SRI GAURAV SINGH KUSHWAHA.

. . . . . .RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR

Ms.KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN, ADV. FOR C/R1 TO R3)

COM.APPEAL.61/2021

3

THIS

COMMMERCIAL

APPEAL

IS

FILED

UNDER

SECTION

13(1A)

OF

THE

COMMERCIAL

COURTS,

COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE

DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015 R/W ORDER 43 RULE

1(r) OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED

ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A DATED 20.02.2021 PASSED BY THE

HON'BLE LXXXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

COMMERCIAL

COURT-CCH

83

AT

BENGALURU

IN

I.A.NOs.1,2 AND 3 IN COM.O.S.No.306/2020, ETC.,

THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND

RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 23.04.2021 AND COMING

ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY,

VISHWAJITH SHETTY J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

The instant commercial appeal is filed by the

appellant, who is the plaintiff before the trial court

seeking to set aside the order dated 20th February 2021

passed by the LXXXII Addl.City Civil and Sessions

Judge and Commercial Court, Bengaluru, on I.A.Nos.1

to 3 in Commercial O.S.No.306/2020 and the appellant

has also filed the following I.As. in this appeal:

a) I.A.No.1/2021 seeking stay of the impugned

order;

b) I.A.No.2/2021

for

production

of

additional

documents;

c) I.A.No.3/2021

for

an

order

of

temporary

injunction restraining the respondent No.1 to 3

from using the disputed registered trademarks

until final disposal of the appeal;

COM.APPEAL.61/2021

4

d) I.A.No.4/2021

for

an

order

of

temporary

injunction restraining the respondent Nos.1 to 3

from using any products or services connected

with

the

jewellery

business,

the

disputed

trademarks until final disposal of the appeal;

e) I.A.No.5/2021 for staying the operation of the

common order in I.A.Nos.1 to 3 dated 20.2.2021

and

all

further

proceedings

in

Com.O.S.No.306/2020

and

all

further

proceedings therein.

2. The appellant, a Private Limited Company had

filed Commercial O.S.No.306/2020 before the trial

court praying for a judgment and decree of perpetual

injunction restraining the respondents and persons

claiming through or under them from using the

trademar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top