SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 13085

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT SUSHEELAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT LEELAMBIKA – Respondent
RSA 296 / 2024



The court allows withdrawal of the appeal based on the parties' settlement agreement.

Headnote:In the oral judgment, the court addressed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal, noting the parties' willingness to report a settlement in F.D.P.No.34/2023. The court permitted the withdrawal as per the filed memo. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

ORAL JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants files memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal and parties are willing to report the settlement in F.D.P.No.34/2023 pending on the file of II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Nanjangudu, Mysuru. Hence, the counsel is permitted to withdraw in terms of the memo. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top