H C GIRISH – Appellant
Versus
SMT B M MALA – Respondent
RFA 12/2007
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT
R. F. A. No.12/2007 (RES)
BETWEEN :
H.C.GIRISH
S/O LATE CHANNAYYA PATEL
A/A: 43 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST
R/O: HOLEBENAVALLI, NIDIGE POST
TQ & DIST : SHIMOGA 3 587201.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI SHIVAYOGI.B.HALLUR, ADV.)
AND :
1.
SMT. B. M. MALA
W/O: H.C.GIRISH
D/O: B. A. MAHESHWARAPPA
A/A : 33 YEARS
2.
H. G. TANU
D/O : H.C.GIRISH
(WRONGLY DESCRIBED AS SON)
A/A : 10 YEARS, MINOR,
R/BY HER MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1
BOTH RESIDING AT : 2ND CROSS
J.P.N. ROAD, SHIMOGA 3 587201.
& RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI DEVARAJ L , ADV
FOR SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE ADV FOR R1 AND R2)
2
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96. READ WITH
ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 07.09.2006 PASSED IN O. S. NO. 125/2006
ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM.,
SHIMOGA,
PARTLY
DECREEING
THE
SUIT
FOR
MAINTENANCE.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed an
application under Order 32 Rule 12 read with Section 151 of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking discharge of the guardian
of respondent No.2. The appellant herein is the father of
respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 is the mother.
2. A joint memo dated 01.04.2021 is filed today before
the Court. It is signed by Sri. S.B. Hallur, learned counsel for
the appellant who is present. Appellant is present in person.
He has also signed the joint memo. The joint memo is signed by
the respondent No.1 and respondent No.2. Learned advocate
Sri. Devaraj L. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is present. He has
also signed the joint memo.
3
3. Since respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are not physically
present, they have sworn to an affidavit before the notary and
annexed the said affidavit to the joint memo. In the affidavit
respondent No.2 has stated that she is aged 24 years. In that
view of the matter and accepting the application filed under
Order 32 Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in view of
attainment of the age of majority by respondent No.2, her
guardian is discharged.
4. In the affidavit jointly sworn to by respondent Nos. 1
and 2, it is stated that Smt. B.M.Mala and Smt. H.G. Tanuja
have read the contents of the joint memo and being aware of the
contents of the same, they have signed it. They have further
stated that due to Covid Pandemic, they are unable to be
present before the Court personally.
5. Since, I am satisfied that parties have signed the joint
memo, they have understood the implications of the same and
because it is in their best interest, I accept the same. Joint
memo is accordingly placed on record.
4
Appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint memo.
Office to draw the decree accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Mgn/-