VENKATARAMANAPPA – Appellant
Versus
VENKATARAMANAPPA @ KARI KENCHAPPA – Respondent
RFA 986/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.986 OF 2014 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
VENKATARAMANAPPA
S/O LATE.MUDHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
R/O: MUDDANAPALYA VILLAGE
(MUDDAIANAPALYA VILLAGE)
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 056.
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
1(a). SRI.ASHATHARAMEGOWDA
S/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
1(b). SRI.MANJUNATHA
S/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
1(c). SRI.MUDDE GOWDA
S/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
1(d). SMT.SAKAMMA
W/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/O:MADUVARA VILLAGE
DASANAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.
2
1(e). SRI.LINGE GOWDA
S/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
1(f). SRI.MANJUNAGAPPA
S/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
1(a) TO (c) AND (e) AND 1(f) ARE
RESIDING AT MUDDAIAHANAPALYA VILLAGE
GIDADA KONENAHALLI
DHAKALE
VISHWANEEDAM POST
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
1(g). SMT.MANJAMMA
W/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
D/O LATE.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/O: THALGHATPURA VILLAGE
KANAKAPURA ROAD
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
&APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.M.K.BHASKARAIAH - ADVOCATE)
AND:
VENKATARAMANAPPA @ KARI KENCHAPPA
S/O LATE.SUGGANAHALLI NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/O MUDDAIANAPALYA VILLAGE
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 056.
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.
1(a). SMT.KEMPAMMA
W/O LATE.CHALUVAIAH
D/O VENKATARAMANAPPA @
KARE KENCHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
3
1(b). KEMPALAKSHMAMMA
W/O VENKATARAMANAPPA @
KARE KENCHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
DEFENDANTS NO.1(a) AND 1(b)
ARE RESIDING AT
GIDADA KENCHANAHALLI GRAMA
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
VISHWANEEDAM POST
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 091.
1(c). SMT.REVAMMA
W/O LATE.MUNIHANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
1(d). SMT.LAKSHMIDEVI
D/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH
GRAND DAUGHTER OF
VENKATARAMANAPPA @
KARE KENCHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
1(e). SRI.VENKATESH
S/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
1(f). SRI.HANUMANTHARAJU
S/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.
1(c) TO 1(f) ARE RESIDING AT
R/O.MUDDAIAHANAPALYA VILLAGE
GIDADAKENCHANAHALLI DHAKALE
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
VISHWANEEDAM POST
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 091.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BENGALURU.
&RESPONDENTS
4
[BY SRI.L.VENKATARAMA REDDY - ADVOCATE
FOR R1(a) AND 1(b) (ABSENT),
R1(c), (d), (e) AND (f) - SERVED
SMT.POORNIMA.M AND
SRI.B.LETHIF - ADVOCATES
FOR R2 (ABSENT)]
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE CODE, 1908.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri.M.K.Bhaskaraiah learned counsel for appellants
has appeared in person. There is no representation on
behalf of respondents 1(a) and 1(b) and respondent No.2.
This is an appeal from the Court of XL Additional City
Civil & Sessions Judge at Bengaluru in O.S.No.3348/2004.
2.
Learned
counsel
Sri.M.K.Bhaskaraiah
for
appellants
submits
that
the
original
plaintiff
Venkataramanappa filed a suit against the original
defendant Venkataramanappa @ Kari Kenchappa for
permanent injunction. The original plaintiff and defendant
5
died during the pendency of the suit before the final
adjudication. Their legal representatives were brought on
record. The Trial Court dismissed the suit on 26.04.2014.
Aggrieved by the said Judgment and Decree, the legal
representatives of deceased original plaintiff have preferred
this appeal.
Submission is noted.
The suit giving rise to this appeal was filed for
permanent injunction simpliciter. It is unnecessary to refer
to the pleadings in detail. Applying the principles of "actio
personalis moritur cum persona", injunction is personal
remedy against a person in particular, the defendant.
Therefore, the very prayer itself makes it clear that its a