KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
M K MUTHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 14693/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
WRIT PETITION No.14693/2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M.K. MUTHAPPA
S/O KALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
RESIDING AT CHIKKATHURU
VILLAGE, KUSHALANAGARA HOBLI,
SOMAVARPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT,
PIN CODE - 571 201.
DULY REPRESENTED BY
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
M. AJITH MUTHAPPA
S/O. M.K. MUTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
RESIDING AT CHIKKATHURU
VILLAGE, KUSHALANAGARA HOBLI,
SOMAVARPET TALUK,
KODAGU DISTRICT,
PIN CODE - 571 201
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHADEVA R.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY DEPUTY RANGE FOREST OFFICER
ARAKALAGUDU RANGE
ARAKALAGUDU TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
PETITION AND QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY
THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN IN
CRL.RVN.PTN.NO.135/2020
DATED
25.06.2021
VIDE
ANNEXURE-A AND CONFIRMED BY THE ORDER PASSED BY
THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT ARAKALAGUDU IN
FOC NO.29/2019-2020 DATED 05.02.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-B
AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION U/S 457 OF THE CODE OF
CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE
AND
FURTHER
DIRECT
THE
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT ARAKALUGUDU TO
RELEASE THE DB BL GUN BEARING NO.A-15354 AND VIVO
SMART MOBILE PHONE BEARING NO. IMEI1869730036257337
AND IMEI2869730036257329 SEIZED IN P.F.NO.29/2020 ON
THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
ARKALAGUDU IN FOC NO.29/2019-2020 DATED 02.01.2020
VIDE ANNEXURE-C
THIS PETITION COMING FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B'
GROUP ON THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
HCGP for the respondent-State.
2.
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and
227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. to quash the order passed by the Principal District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Hassan
in
Crl.RP.No.135/2020
dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for release of
DB BL Gun as well as Mobile Phones.
3
3.
The case of the prosecution is that Deputy Range
Forest Officer, Arakalgudu registered a case against the
petitioners and others in Cr.No.FOC.29/2019-2020 for the
offence punishable under Section 24 of the Karnataka Forest
Act read with Sections 2, 9 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection)
Act, 1972 on the ground that on 02.01.2020, the accused
persons were found holding arms and attempting to hunt the
animals. The petitioner is said to have been in possession of
DB BL Gun. The same was seized by the Forest Officials and
registered the case against the petitioner and others. The
petitioner approached the trial Court for release of the Gun by
filing the application under Section 457 of Cr.P.C., which
came to be dismissed. Therefore, the petitioner approached
the Sessions Judge under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., which also
came to be dismissed. Hence, the petitioner is before this
Court.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that
petitioner found in possession of DB BL Gun and he is the
owner of the said DB BL Gun and he possess the license of
the Gun. However, the petitioner has not hunted any animal.
He further submits that investigation is almost complete and
4
the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be
imposed by this Court and he is the license holder of the Gun
and that Gun is required for his protection as his house is
situated near forest area.
5.
On the other hand, learned HCGP seriously
objected the same and contended that if the gun is released,
he may commit serious offence.
6.
Admittedly, the petitioner is said to be license
holder of the gun bearing No.A-15354 and Mobile Phones
bearing
Nos.IMEI186973003657737
and
IMEI2869730036257329. The allegation against the accused
perso