AKKALAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP 357/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.357 OF 2021
BETWEEN
AKKALAPPA
S/O. MARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT D. SAJJUPALLI VILLAGE,
CHELUR HOBLI, BAGEPALLI TALUK 3 561 207,
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI CHETHAN A.C., ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY BAGEPALLI EXCISE POLICE,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF
CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE,
PRAYING
TO
SET
ASIDE
THE
JUDGMENT OF THE
THIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA, DATED 24.09.2019 IN
CRL.A.NO.10/2015 AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BAGEPALLI,
DATED 05.01.2015 IN C.C. NO.338/2013 CONVICTING THE
2
PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER SECTIONS 32 AND 34 OF THE
KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT OF
THE TRIAL COURT.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN
HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 09.08.2021 AND
COMING ON FOR PRONOUCEMENT, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed by the
petitioner-accused against the concurrent findings of the
Courts below convicting him for the offences punishable
under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act,
1965
and
sentencing
him
to
undergo
rigorous
imprisonment for one year and also to pay fine of
Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment
for two months for the offence punishable under Section
32 of the Karnataka Excise Act; and further sentencing him
to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay fine
of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment
for two months for the offence punishable under Section
34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.
3
2.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for
the respondent-State.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that, on 14.04.2013,
PW.2-Nagaraja Shetty, the Election Officer was posted for
Karnataka Assembly Election duty of 2013. When he was
proceeding near G. Maddepalli cross, Bagepalli Taluk, he
found the accused carrying the alcohol illegally in a yellow
colour plastic bag. Immediately, he apprehended him in
the presence of PW.4-Excise Guard and PW.5-Home Guard
and on verification of the bag, found him in possession of
34 Highwards Beer Cheer Whisky of tetra packets of 180
ML each and 10 Knockout Punch Beer bottles of 330 ML
each. Immediately, PW-2 informed PW.6 i.e., Excise
Inspector of Bagepalli to come and seize the articles.
Subsequently, on 11.45 p.m., PW.6 came to the spot and
seized the articles in the presence of PWs.4 and 5. After
registering the case, further investigation was conducted
by PW.3 and charge sheet came to be filed and the
4
accused was released on bail. The charges were framed
against the accused, but he pleaded not guilty. In order to
prove the same, the prosecution examined 6 witnesses,
got marked 9 documents and 6 material objects. After the
completion of evidence, the statement of accused under
Section 313 of Cr.P.C was recorded. The case of the
accused was one of total denial, but not lead any defence
evidence. After hearing the arguments, learned Magistrate
convicted the accused and sentenced him to undergo
imprisonment as stated above. The same was challenged
before the First Appellate Court in Criminal Appeal
No.10/2015. The First Appellate Court also dismissed the
appeal by confirming the conviction and sentence passed
by the Trial Court. Hence, the accused is before this
Court.
4.
Learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner/accused
vehemently argued mainly on three grounds i.e, the
accused is said to be apprehended by PW.2. Imm