MR. R. VENKATARAMANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 13275/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.13275 OF 2017 (GM-RES-PIL)
BETWEEN:
1. MR. R. VENKATARAMANA
S/O LATE LAXMINARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/O SONNASHETTYHALLI, CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
2. MR. S. NATARAJ
S/O LATE SEENAPPA M
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/O SONNASHETTYHALLI, CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK,
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
3. MR. A R ANVAR
S/O ABDUL RASHEED,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/O VENKATAGIRIKOTE, CHINTAMANI TOWN AND TALUK,
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA STATE.
4. MR. K MANJUNATH
S/O KADIRAPPA,
2
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/O JJ COLONEY, RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA STATE.
5. MR. R PRAKASH
S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/O SONNASHETTYHALLI, CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK,
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
6. MR. C.N.MANJUNATH
S/O C.V. NARAYANASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/O RAJIV NAGAR, BEHIND SHANI MAHATHMA TEMPLE,
BANGALORE ROAD, CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK
CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
7. MR. JANARDHANA N
S/O NARAYANASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
TAPATHESHWARA COLONEY, WARD NO.14,
CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK, CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
8. MR. G S RAGHUNATH REDDY
S/O G.V. SRIRAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
GOPALLI VILLAGE, NANDIGANAHALLI POST,
CHINTAMANI TOWN & TALUK, CHIKKABHALAPURA DISTRICT
KARNATAKA STATE.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.CHANNAKESHAVA B S, ADVOCATE)
3
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA, VEDHANA VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-01.
2. SENIOR GEOLOGIST
OFFICE OF MINES AND GEOLOGY,
CHIKKABHALLAPURA-562 101.
3. RANGE FOREST OFFICER
CHINTAMANI RANGE,
CHINTAMANI-562101.
4. SECRETARY
VILLAGE PANCHAYATH,
KONAPALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK - 562 101.
5. GANGADARESHWARA SEVA TRUST (R)
KISHORE VIDHYA BHAVAN,
CHINTAMANI, KOLAR DISTRICT-562101
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF PATRON,
MR. CHOWDA REDDY,
S/O. M.C. ANJANEYA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.RAJASHEKAR.S, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI.S.LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
NOTICE TO R4 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO 4 TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE P-1 AT ANNEXURE-L
AND CONSEQUENTLY TAKE APPROPRIATE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST
THE R-5 AND ALSO TAKE OVER THE POSSESSION OF THE ENTIRE
LAND WHICH IS UNAUTHORIZED POSSESSION.
4
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard.
2.
This public interest litigation has been filed alleging
illegal construction of temple in the cave on the forest land.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has informed
that the Court vide order dated 17.02.2020 had directed the
State Government to take appropriate decision as to whether
the alleged illegal construction can be regularized. The order
dated 17.02.2020 for convenience is reproduced below:
"The learned Additional Government Advocate
states that the application for regularization made by
the fifth respondent on 14th August 2015 is still
pending. We have perused the said application. The
said application accepts that on a land vesting in the
State
Government,
on
a
hill
station,
without
permission of the State Government, idols have been
installed by creating a cave having measurement of
400 ft. x 500 ft. Another structure admeasuring 40 ft.
5
x 50 ft. has been constructed on the Government
land.
Surprisingly, it is stated in the application that
the Members of Parliament and the Members of
Legislative Council have sanctioned funds from the
funds allocated to them for providing proper road
facility to the temple.
The contention of the learn