SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

M. RAJASHEKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent
CRL.P 2651/2021



1

Crl.P.No.2651/2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2651 OF 2021

BETWEEN:

M.RAJASHEKARAN,

S/O LATE MARIYAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

R/AT NO.324, 7TH MAIN,

3RD CROSS, VIVEKNAGAR,

BANGALORE-560047

& PETITIONER

(BY SRI.VISHNUMURTHY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

KONANKUNTE P.S.

R/P BY SPP HIGH COURT

BANGALORE-560001

2.

SANJAY @ C.PAUL

S/O JAYAVEERA

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

R/AT NO.31, SANTHRUPTHI NAGAR,

J.P.NAGAR, 7TH PHASE

BANGALORE-560078

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.R.D.RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R-1;

SRI.S.M.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

2

Crl.P.No.2651/2021

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION

482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN

CR.NO.73/2021

OF

KONANKUNTE

P.S.,

(PCR.NO.2202/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV

ACMM, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTION

406, 420 OF IPC.)

THIS

CRIMINAL

PETITION

COMING

ON

FOR

ADMISSION,

THIS

DAY,

THE

COURT

MADE

THE

FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent

No.1 and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

2.

Petitioner

who

is

accused

in

Crime

No.73/2021 has approached this Court with a prayer to

quash the entire proceeding in PCR.No.2202/2016

which is pending before the IV ACMM, Bengaluru and

the

FIR

arising

out

of

the

said

case

in

Crime.No.73/2021 registered by the Konankunte Police

station for the offence punishable under Sections 406,

420 of IPC.

3

Crl.P.No.2651/2021

3.

Brief facts of the case relevant for the

purpose of disposal of the petition are that the 2nd

respondent-complainant has filed a private complaint

before

the

Court

of

IV

ACMM,

Bengaluru

in

PCR.No.2202/2016 against the petitioner herein and

the said complaint was initially referred to J.P.Nagar

Police station on 10.03.2016. Subsequently at the

request of the Investigating Officer the case was referred

to Konankunte police station on 18.09.2018.

4.

On 25.02.2021 the learned counsel for the

complainant advanced the case and at his request once

again the learned Magistrate has passed an order of

reference under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. directing the

Konankunte Police Station to investigate the matter. In

the private complaint it is averred that in the year 2010,

the complainant came to know the petitioner herein

through his friend Nanda kumar and for the purpose of

getting some work done from the BDA, the petitioner

4

Crl.P.No.2651/2021

had approached the complainant and in this regard a

sum of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid by the petitioner to the

complainant. It is case of the complainant when a sum

of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid by the petitioner at his

request he had given blank cheques and also a

promissory note to the petitioner. Subsequently, the

work could not be finished for certain reasons and the

complainant had spent a major portion of the amount of

Rs.2,00,000/- paid by the petitioner. The complainant

informed the petitioner that he had only a balance of

Rs.22,000/- out of Rs.2,00,000/- and he offered to pay

the same but the petitioner did not receive the same

and on the other hand he has misused the cheques and

filed proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instrument Act, against the complainant. He submits

that the blank cheque was misused and the petitioner

had filled the cheque for a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- and

on the basis of the same, the complainant was wrongly

prosecuted for the offence under Section 138 of the

5

Crl.P.No.2651/2021

Negotiable Instrument Act. Therefore, he filed private

complaint alleging offences of cheating as against the

petitioner and the said complaint was referred by the

jurisdictional Magistrate to the police who registered FIR

against the petitioner.

5.

Learned counsel for the petition

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top