SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - BENCH AT DHARWAD
INSTITUTE OF INDIAN INTERIOR DESIGNERS IIID – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES – Respondent
WP 102340/2021



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD

WRIT PETITION No.102340/2021 (GM-KSR)

BETWEEN:

1 .

INSTITUTE OF INDIAN INTERIOR DESIGNERS(IIID)

A REGISTERED SOCIETY UNDER

THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960,

REGISTERED OFFICE. PLYWOOD COLONY,

DANDELI,

DISTRICT. UTTARA KANNADA,

KARNATAKA STATE.

PIN CODE. 581325.

HEAD OFFICE AT WORLI,

MUMBAI

REPRESENTED BY ITS

NATIONAL PRESIDENT AS PETITIONER NO.1

OF THE INSTITUTE,

MRS. JABEEN W/O LALICHAN ZACHARIAS,

AGE. 58 YEARS,

OCC. ARCHITECT AND PRESIDENT OF IIID.

2 .

MRS. JABEEN W/O LALICHANL ZACHARIAS

AGE. 58 YEARS,

OCC. ARCHITECT AND

CURRENT MEMBER OF NEC AND MEMBER OF IIID,

R/O. NO.49, KAKKAMTHOTTIL,

JAYANAGAR, KANNADIKKADU,

MARADU, ERNAKULUM,

KERALA STATE, PIN CODE. 682304.

3 .

INSTITUTE OF INDIAN INTERIOR DESIGNER (IIID)

A REGISTERED SOCIETY

UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES

REGISTRATION ACT, 1960,

REGISTERED OFFICE.PLYWOOD COLONY,

DANDELI,

2

DISTRICT. UTTARA KANNADA,

KARNATAIKA STATE, PIN CODE 581325.

REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY,

AS PETITIONER NO.2 OF THE INSTITUTE

SHRI. JIGNESH S/O ISHWARLAL MODI

AGE. 50 YEARS,

OCC. ARCHITECT AND HONORARY SECRETARY OF IIID,

R/O. NO.F-5, VIGNESHWAR ESTATE,

BESIDE GANDHI SMRUTI BHAVAN,

NANPURA, SURAT,

STATE. GUJARAT, PIN CODE. 395001

4 .

SHRI. JIGNESH S/O ISHWARLAL MODI

AGE. 50 YEARS,

OCC. ARCHITECT AND CURRENT

MEMBER OF NEC AND MEMBER OF IIID,

R/O. NO.F-5, VIGNESHWAR ESTATE,

BESIDE GANDHI SMRUTI BHAVAN,

NANPURA, SURAT,

STATE GUJARAT, PIN CODE. 395001

...Petitioners

(By Sri JAYAKUMAR S PATIL, SR.COUNSEL FOR

Sri SANJAY S KATAGERI, ADV.)

AND

1 .

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES

AND THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF

CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,

UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR DISTRICT,

PIN CODE. 581301.

2 .

SMT. B K TANUJA

AGE. 60 YEARS,

OCC. SELF DECLARED PRESIDENT OF IIID,

R/O. KANVINDE RAI AND CHOWDHURY,

14-F, MIDDLE CIRCLE,

CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI 110001

3 .

SMT. GAYATRI SHETTY

AGE. 61 YEARS,

OCC. JOINT HONORARY SECRETARY OF IIID,

R/O. NO. 14, TEMPLE, TREES ROW,

CAUVERY COLONY, BENGALURU 560047.

&..Respondents

3

(By Sri.SHIVAPRABHU S HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1;

Sri SHIVARAJ S BALLOLI & Sri HARISH KUMAR V L, ADVS.

FOR C/R2 & 3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT

IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE

WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED

ORDER DATED 15.06.2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-M HEREIN, PASSED

BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN DISTRICT REGISTRAR AND

DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, UTTARA

KANNADA, KARWAR, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION BY THIS

HON9BLE COURT.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to

take notice for respondent No.1.

2.

This writ petition is directed against the order

dated 15.06.2021 passed by respondent No.1 vide Annexure-

M whereby he has stayed suspension order issued by the 1st

petitioner society.

3.

Sri. Jayakumar S. Patil, learned senior counsel

appearing for the petitioners has primarily contended that the

impugned order Annexure-M passed by the 1st respondent is

without authority of law. He has no power under the Societies

Registration Act to stay the suspension order issued by the 1st

respondent society.

4

4.

Sri. Harish Kumar, primarily objected regarding

maintainability of the writ petition. He contended that the

writ petition is filed by the Society represented by its

President and Secretary and two members. In the affidavit

filed along with the writ petition, it is stated in paragraph 2

that <the president is filing this affidavit on behalf of

respondent Nos.3 and 4.= He contended that before filing the

writ petition the National Executive Committee-NEC has to

authorize

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top