SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
M/S MFAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Commissioner of commercial taxes zone-ii – Respondent
WA 309/2020



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

WRIT APPEAL NO.309/2020

C/W

WRIT APPEAL NO. 386/2020

WRIT APPEAL NO. 4039/2019 (T-RES)

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.309/2020

BETWEEN:

M/S MFAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,

NO.8 AND 8A, AVS COMPOUND,

80 FEET ROAD, 4TH CLOCK,

KORAMANGALA,

BENGALURU-560034

REPRESENTED BY ITS

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

SRI FAYAZ KAMALUDDIN,

S/O LATE K.P.KAMALUDDIN,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.

&APPELLANT

(BY SRI.G.SHIVADASS, SR. ADV., FOR

SRI.H.Y.HARISH, ADV.)

AND:

1.

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF

COMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE-II

6TH FLOOR, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA-1

2

GANDHINAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 009

2.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

COMMERCIAL TAXES

AUDIT-4.5, DVO-4,

ROOM NO.204

2ND FLOOR, VTK-2,

KORAMANGALA,

BANGALORE-560 047

3.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,

BY ITS SECRETARY,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BENGALURU-560 001

& RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.VIKRAM HUILGOL, AGA)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 06.12.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT

PETITION NO.35989 TO 36000/2016, IN SO FAR AS APPELLANT IS

CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.386/2020

BETWEEN:

M/S ANS CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.,

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING

ITS OFFICE AT NO.201,

MATHA RESIDENCY ASHOK NAGAR,

KOTTARA,

MANGALORE-575006

REPRESENTED BY ITS

AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,

SRI RAGHUNATH PRASAD,

S/O SRI RAGHUNATH,

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

&APPELLANT

(BY SRI.G.SHIVADASS, SR. ADV., FOR

SRI.H.Y.HARISH, ADV.)

3

AND:

1.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL

TAXES, (AUDIT-2), DIVISION VAT OFFICE,

MAIDAN ROAD,

MANGALORE-575 001

2.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,

BY ITS SECRETARY,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BENGALURU-560 001

& RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.VIKRAM HUILGOL, AGA)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 06.12.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT

PETITION NO.32896-32919/2016, IN SO FAR AS APPELLANT IS

CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.4039/2019

BETWEEN:

M/S MANGALORE FORCE

URWA STORE ROAD

KOTTARA CHOWKI

MANGALORE-575 005

A PARTNERSHIP FIRM

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER

SRI MUKESH M

S/O SRI SHEKHAR M

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

&APPELLANT

(BY SRI.G.SHIVADASS, SR. ADV., FOR

SRI.H.Y.HARISH, ADV.)

AND:

1.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF

COMMERCIAL TAXES -ENFORCEMENT-02

WEST ZONE

VANIJYA THERIGE BHAVANA

4

MAIDAN ROAD

MANGALURU-575 001

2.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

BY ITS SECRETARY

VIDHANA SOUDHA

BENGALURU-560 001

& RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.VIKRAM HUILGOL, AGA)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 06.12.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT

PETITION NO.33372/2018 AND ETC.

THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR

JUDGMENT, THIS DAY SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED

THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGEMENT

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy

involved in all the three cases, they were heard analogously

together and a common judgment is being passed.

2.

The present appeals are arising out of the common

order dated 6.12.2009 passed in WP.Nos.35989 to 36000/2016

(M/s MFAR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Additional Commissioner of

Commercial Taxes and Others), passed in WP.Nos.32896-

32919/2016

(M/s

ANS

Constructions

Ltd.,

vs.

Deputy

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) and passed in

5

WP.No.33372/2018 (M/s. Mangalore Force vs. the Assistant

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes 3 Enforcement -02 & Anr.,).

3.

The facts of WA.No.309/2020 are narrated as under:

The facts of the case reveal that the appellant before this

Court is a private limited company registered under the

Companies Act and is engaged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top