SRI PRAJWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 1463/2019
CRL.P.1463/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRL.P.No.1463/2019
BETWEEN:
SRI PRAJWAL
S/O RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO.984, 2ND PHASE,
VIJAYANAGAR 4TH STAGE,
MYSURU CITY-570018.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI C.RAJANNA, ADV.(ABSENT))
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY VIJAYANAGARA POLICE STATION,
MYSURU CITY,
REP. BY ITS P.P.,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
..RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAHUL RAI.K., HCGP)
This criminal petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401
Cr.P.C praying to set aside the order dated 11.12.2018 made in
S.C.No.245/2018 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge,
Mysuru City and to allow the application filed by the petitioner
u/s 328 r/w Sec.329 and 330 of Code Criminal Procedure and
refer the petitioner to the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist
for care and treatment and call for report of the same.
CRL.P.1463/2019
2
This petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court
made the following:
ORDER
1.
None appears for the petitioner either physically or
through video conference. However, learned HCGP for the
State is present before the Court physically.
2.
This matter is listed for non-compliance of office
objections for the third time. Neither the learned Counsel for
the petitioner nor the petitioner who is an accused in
S.C.No.245/2018 is diligent or vigilant to cure the office
objections under the curial law to proceed further in this
matter in accordance with law.
3.
In this petition, petitioner is seeking to set aside the
order dated 11.12.2018 passed by the II Addl. Sessions
Judge, Mysuru City, in S.C.No.245/2018, wherein the
application filed by the accused under Section 328 read with
Sections 329 & 330 Cr.PC has been rejected.
4.
The charge sheet has been laid by the investigating
agency against the accused before the committal court i.e.,
JMFC-IV, Mysuru. The copy of the charge sheet has been
CRL.P.1463/2019
3
furnished to the petitioner for compliance as under Section
209 of Cr.P.C,. In addition to that, the report of the
Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, has been
produced relating to the treatment given to the accused. The
said report discloses the illness details, family history,
personal history, physical findings, the treatment given to the
accused in the hospital. Further, the discharge summary
reveals that the patient was on tapering dose of it in
observation report from prison. Later was change to
T.Clonazepam 0.5mg i/v/o sleep disturbances and also he
has not reported death wish or any suicidal ideas in last 10
days and also he reports his mood is also better now i/v/o
and has been recommended for discharge. These are all the
observations made by the Head of the Department of
Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru. The out patient records
maintained by the K.R.Hospital, Mysuru, is also produced for
the purpose of perusal.
5.
Whereas in this petition, the order dated 11.12.2018
rejecting the application has been challenged by the accused.
The offences alleged against the accused, appears to be
CRL.P.1463/2019
4
serious in nature and that of committing the murder.
Therefore, it is deemed appropriate to state that the petition
seeking intervention under Section 482 Cr.PC challenging
the order passed by the Trial Court in S.C.No.245/2018,
deserves to be rejected. Therefore, I proceed to pass the
following order.
6.
The petition filed by the petitioner/accused under
Section 482 Cr.PC is hereby rejected. Upon disposal of the
main petition, I.A.No.1/2019 is dismissed as it does not
survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KK