KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
ASHLESH. A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE BY – Respondent
CRL.P 5929/2021
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5929 OF 2021
C/W
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.769 OF 2021
IN CRL.P.NO.5929/2021
BETWEEN :
ASHLESH A.
S/O ASHOKAN,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
OCC: DRIVER
R/AT GANESHA NAGARA
JAPPINAMOGARU,
MANGALURU - 575 007
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SERNIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. DINESH KUMAR RAO K., ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE STATE BY
ECONOMIC AND NARCOTIC CRIME POLICE STATION,
MANGALURU CITY,
D.K. MANGALURU - 575 075
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
- 2 -
BAIL IN SPL.C.NO.103/2021 IN CRIME NO.19/2020 OF
ECONOMIC
AND
NARCOTIC
CRIME
POLICE
STATION,
MANGALURU CITY, D.K.DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
21 AND 21(C) OF N.D.P.S. ACT.
IN CRL.P.NO.769/2021
BETWEEN :
SAHIL MOHAMMED
S/O LATE SAIPUDDIN,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
OCCUPATION - STUDENT
R/AT SAWRABA, NEAR 1ST RAILWAY,
BRIDGE, MARNAMIKATTE,
MANGALURU - 575 007.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SERNIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. DINESH KUMAR RAO K., ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE STATE BY
ECONOMIC AND NARCOTIC CRIME POLICE STATION,
PANDESHWAR,
MANGALURU - 575 075
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN CRIME NO.19/2020 OF ECONOMIC AND NARCOTIC
CRIME POLICE STATION, MANGALURU CITY, D.K. FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 21 AND 21(C) OF N.D.P.S. ACT.
THESE CRIMINAL PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
- 3 -
COMMON ORDER
The petitioners - accused Nos.1 and 2 are before this
Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in
Crime No.19/2020 of E and N Crime Police Station, registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 21 and 21(c) of
the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
(for short 'NDPS Act'), on the basis of the first information
lodged by the informant Mohan.
2.
Heard Sri.K.Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior
counsel for the petitioners and Sri.K.S.Abhijith, learned
Counsel for the respondent - State. Perused the materials
placed on record.
3.
Learned
senior
counsel
for
the
petitioners
submitted that the petitioner in Crl.P.No.5929/2021 is arrayed
as accused No.1 and the petitioner in Crl.P.No.769/2021 is
arrayed as accused No.2. They are innocent and have not
committed any offence as alleged. They have been falsely
implicated in the matter without any basis. They were
apprehended on 09.08.2020 and since then they are in
judicial custody. The investigation has been completed and
- 4 -
the charge sheet is also filed. It is alleged that the
commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from the
possession of these petitioners. The personal search of the
petitioners were not conducted in the presence of Gazetted
Officer as required under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. When
the mandatory procedure as contemplated under the Act is
not complied with, there is no possibility of conviction of the
petitioners. The investigation is completed and the charge
sheet came to be filed, without furnishing the FSL report.
However, subsequently, FSL report came to be filed before
the Court. The seizure mahazar relied on by the prosecution
discloses that the contraband said to have been secured from
the personal search of accused Nos.1 and 2 on 09.08.2020,
but the Gazetted Officer Sri. Jagadish signed the same on
10.08.2020. Therefore, it is clear that the Gazetted Officer
was not present when the contraband said to have been was
seized at the instance of accused Nos.1 and 2. Absolutely,
there is no material to connect the petitioners to the offence
in question. The petitioners are not having any criminal
antecedents. Accused No.2 is a student pursuing h