NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
LOHIT KUMAR – Respondent
MFA 4638/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON9BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4638 OF 2016 (MV)
BETWEEN:
1. Narasamma
W/o late Chikkanna
Aged about 46 years
2. Vasantha Kumar
S/o late Chikkanna
Aged about 21 years
3. Narasimha Murthy
S/o late Chikkanna
Aged about 17 years
The 3rd appellant is minor
Represented by his natural
Guardian and mother first
Appellant.
All are residents of
Havinamadagu
Madhugiri Taluk
Now R/at Nelahal Village
Tumkur Taluk-572 101.
2
...Appellants
(By Shri Shantharaj K, Advocate)
AND:
1. Lohit Kumar
S/o Manjunatha
Aged about 41 years
R/at No.245, 8th Main
Doddabetta Halli
Chowdeshwari Layout
Vidyaranyapura
Bengaluru-560 097.
2. The Manager
Reliance General Insurance
Company Ltd
S M Tower, 2nd Floor
11th Main, 3rd Block
Jayanagara
Bengaluru-560 011.
3. Sreerangappa
S/o late Halli Rangappa
Aged about 46 years
R/at Badavanahalli
Village and Post
Dodderi Hobli
Madhugiri Taluk-572 132.
...Respondents
(by Shri B Pradeep, Advocate for R2;
Vide Order dated 01.12.2016 Notice to R1 dispensed with;
Vide Order dated 29.03.2021 Notice to R3 held sufficient)
3
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section
173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and
award dated 11.03.2016 passed in MVC No.652 of 2015 on the
file of the VI Additional District Judge, Additional MACT, Tumkur,
partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking
enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First appeal coming on for Admission,
this day, INDIRESH J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the claimants against the
judgment and award dated 11th March, 2016 passed in MVC
No.652 of 2015 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge and
Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tumkur (for short
hereinafter referred to as the <Tribunal=) seeking enhancement
of compensation.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal
are referred to as per their rank and status before the Tribunal.
3. It is the case of the claimants that on 01st December,
2014, the husband of the claimant No.1-Chikkanna was
travelling in the Tractor-Trailer bearing Registration No.KA-
06/TA-3254-3255 on Sira-Tumkur NH-48 road and when the
tractor reached near Nelahal Circle, a Car bearing registration
4
No.KA-53/P-351 dashed to the tractor as a result of which
husband of the claimant No.1 sustained injuries and died in the
hospital. On account of the death of said Chikkanna, the
claimants have suffered both mental and financial loss and
therefore have preferred claim petition in MVC No.652 of 2015
on the file of the Tribunal, seeking compensation.
4. After service of summons, first respondent remained
absent and was placed ex-parte. The second respondent filed
written statement denying the averments made in the claim
petition, however, admits the issuance of insurance policy
covering the risk of the offending vehicle subject to the policy
conditions. Respondent No.3 filed written statement denying the
averments made in the claim petition and had taken a specific
contention that the accident occurred due to the rash and
negligent driving of the car.
5. Based on the pleadings, the Tribunal formulated issues
for its consideration. Claimant No.1 was examined as PW1 and
she has marked six documents as Exhibits P1 and P6.
Respondents have examined two witnesses as RW1 and RW2
5
and marked two documents as Exhibits R1 and R2. The
Tribunal, after considering the material on record, allowed the
claim
petition
in
part
and
awarded
compensation
of
Rs.5,70,104/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from
the date of petition till its realisation. Insofar as liability is
concerned, the Tribunal apportioned the negligence 50% each on
both the vehicles i