WASEEM HYDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent
CRL.P 1301/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1301/2021
BETWEEN:
WASEEM HYDER @
WASIM S/O SYED INAYATH,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/AT #46/A, 5TH CROSS,
II MAIN, BAPUJINAGARA,
BENGALURU 3 560 026.
(IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) &PETITIONER
(BY SRI.RAMESHA H N, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VEERANNA G TIGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
HIRIYUR RURAL POLICE STATION
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 3 577 599.
REP.BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 3 560 001.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON9BLE COURT MAY
BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.348/2018(C.C.NO.693/2019)
OF
HIRIYUR
RURAL
P.S.,
CHITRADURGA
DISTRICT
FOR
THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 395 OF IPC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused
No.6 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for granting regular
bail in Crime No.348/2018 registered by Hiriyuru Rural
Police for the offence punishable under Section 395 of
Indian Penal Code.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that one
Ranganatha filed a complaint on 3.10.2018 alleging
that he was working as a cashier in HP Petrol Bunk,
near K.R. Hally, Hiriyuru Taluk on night duty between
10.00 p.m. and 2.00 p.m., and thereafter he went to
sleep and one Rajashekar was looking after the petrol
bunk duty. At that time, at about 3.10 a.m., a Swift
car came for filing diesel and the inmates of the car by
3
showing the weapons, robbed the cash from the
complainant and also from the treasury for about
Rs.1,48,000/- and cash of Rs.5,000/- from CW.1,
Rs.8,000/-
from
CW.2,
Rs.3,000/-
from
CW.4,
Rs.30,000/- from CW.5 and cell phone. After
registering the case against unknown persons, during
the investigation, it is revealed that the petitioner and
accused persons were arrested by Bidadi police in
Crime No.363/2018 for the offence punishable under
Section 395 of Indian Penal Code on 23.12.2018 and
thereafter, the presence of the petitioner was secured
under body warrant.
4.
Upon hearing the arguments of learned
counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP and on
perusal of the records, it shows that no doubt some
unknown persons came and committed dacoity in the
petrol bunk and after arrest, absolutely there is no
recovery shown in the case with regard to the money
robbed from the petrol bunk though some of the
4
weapons were seized by the police but absolutely there
is no money seized in this case. The co-accused No.5
is
already
granted
bail
by
this
court
in
Crl.P.No.3687/2020 on 2.9.2020. The only objection
from the prosecution is that he is involved in similar
eleven cases. The learned counsel submits that he has
been granted bail in all nine cases except two cases.
Learned counsel submits that there is no test
identification parade conducted by the police for
identifying the accused persons who is stated to have
committed the offence. Therefore, looking to the facts
and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is in
custody for almost two years. Therefore, without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and
by
imposing
certain
conditions,
if
the
petitioner/accused No.6 is granted bail, no prejudice
would be caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence,
I pass the following:
ORDER
The criminal petition is allowed.
5
The trial Court is directed to release the
petitioner/accused No.6 on bail in Crime No.348/2018
registered by Hiriyuru Rural Police for the offences
punishable under Section 395