SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT THARA S – Appellant
Versus
SIDDAPPA ODEYAR – Respondent
MFA 2490/2021



1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU

BEFORE THE MEGA LOK ADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

&

SMT. S.SUSHEELA, MEMBER

M.F.A.No. 2490/2021 (MV)

(Lok Adalat No. 2838/2021)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. THARA .S

W/O LATE VIJAYA KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

2.

SMT. PARVATHAMMA

W/O MARILINGAIAH

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

3.

SRI. MARILINGAIAH

S/O LATE KUNNAIAH

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

ALL ARE RESIDENT OF:

# 245/3, C.A.KERE HOBLI,

BHARATHINAGAR, MADDURU-

-TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.

... APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. PUTTA SWAMY C, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SIDDAPPA ODEYAR

S/O MAHADEVAPPA ODEYAR,

THALAGAVADI VILLAGE,

KIRAGAVAL POST,

MALAVALLI TALUK,

2

MANDYA DISTRICT

(R1 - EXPARATE)

2.

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO., LTD

REGIONAL OFFICE,

NO.9/2,2ND FLOOR,

MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS,

M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 01.

[REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER]

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B.C.SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT

AND

AWARD

DT:

29.01.2021

PASSED

IN

MVC

NO.184/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES

JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-11), PARTLY ALLOWING THE

CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT

OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE MEGA

LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

CONCILIATION ORDER

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is

present through video conferencing/Physical Hearing. The learned

Counsel appearing for the Respondent 3 Insurance Company along

with its representative are present.

2.

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo

signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants

(being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned

advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its

authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to

receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a

3

lump-sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only), in addition to

what has been awarded by the claims tribunal, in full and final

settlement of the claim.

3.

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the

said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of

preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest

at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

4.

The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced

compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgement and

Award passed by the Claims Tribunal.

5.

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of

the Joint memo. The Judgment of the Tribunal shall stands modified

accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

MEMBER

RN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top