SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SYED ABUALI @ KODI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 389/2021



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN

CRIMINAL PETITION No.389 OF 2021

AND

CRIMINAL PETITION No.415 OF 2021

IN CRL.P.No.389/2021

BETWEEN

1.

SYED ABUALI @ KODI

S/O. MOHAMMED ALI,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF GANGANAGAR,

NEAR K.C. NARAYANA SCHOOL,

GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH - 515 801.

2.

SAJJAD ALI @ ANDA @ SAJJAD BABA AZEEZ ALI

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF BEHIND PADMAVATHI HOSPITAL,

GANGANAGAR, GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH 3 515 801.

3.

SHIYA RANI @ RANI

W/O. ABBAS ALI @ KHALQ,

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF BEHIND

PADMAVATHI HOSPITAL,

GANGANAGAR, GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH 3 515 801.

& PETITIONERS

(BY SRI RAMACHANDRA A., ADVOCATE)

2

AND

STATE OF KARNATAKA

HIRIYUR TOWN POLICE STATION,

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

VEEDANA VEEDI,

BANGALORE 3 560 001.

& RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE

PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN CRIME No.134/2019, OF HIRIYUR TOWN

POLICE STATION, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 392 AND 413 OF IPC.

IN CRL.P.No.415/2021

BETWEEN

1.

SYED ABUALI @ KODI

S/O. MOHAMMED ALI,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF GANGANAGAR,

NEAR K.C. NARAYANA SCHOOL,

GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH - 515 801.

2.

SAJJAD ALI @ ANDA @ SAJJAD BABA AZEEZ ALI

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF BEHIND PADMAVATHI HOSPITAL,

GANGANAGAR, GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH 3 515 801.

3.

SHIYA RANI @ RANI

W/O. ABBAS ALI @ KHALQ,

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF BEHIND

PADMAVATHI HOSPITAL,

3

GANGANAGAR, GUNTHAKAL TOWN,

ANNATHPUR DISTRICT,

ANDRA PRADESH 3 515 801.

& PETITIONERS

(BY SRI RAMACHANDRA A., ADVOCATE)

AND

STATE OF KARNATAKA

HIRIYUR TOWN POLICE STATION,

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

VEEDANA VEEDI,

BANGALORE 3 560 001.

& RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE

PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN CRIME No.67/2019 OF HIRIYUR TOWN

POLICE STATION, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 392 AND 413 OF IPC.

THESE CRIMINAL PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Criminal

Petition

No.389/2021

is

filed

by

the

petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

for

granting

regular

bail

in

Crime

No.134/2019

(C.C.No.1253/2020) registered by the Hiriyur Town Police

Station for the offences punishable under Section 392, 413 of

IPC.

4

Criminal Petition No.415/2021 is also filed by the

petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

for

granting

regular

bail

in

Crime

No.67/2019

(C.C.No.1256/2020) registered by Hiriyur Town Police for the

offences punishable under Sections 392 and 413 of IPC.

2.

The case of the prosecution in Criminal Petition

No.389/2021 is that a complaint was filed by one Vanajakshi

on 06.07.2019 alleging that when she was walking alone,

two persons came in a motor bike and snatched away the

Mangalya chain weighing 48 grams and ran away. In

Criminal Petition No.415/2021, the complaint was filed by

one Hemavathi before the Police on 14.04.2019, the Police

registered a case against unknown persons in Crime

No.67/2019 for having snatched away 35 grams of gold chain

under the guise of asking for address. After registering the

case against unknown persons, during the investigation, the

Police arrested the petitioners on 17.08.2019 and remanded

them to judicial custody. Their bail petitions came to be

5

rejected by the Sessions Judge. Hence, the petitioners are

before this Court.

3.

Learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top