SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.P.VIVEKANAND – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR.M.J – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1098/2016

BETWEEN:

M.P. VIVEKANAND,

S/O LATE M.A.PUTTEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/O 8SHARAVATHI9,

MAKONAHALLI VILLAGE,

MUDIGERE TALUK,

CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT

577101

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H.,

ADVOCATE)

AND:

ARUN KUMAR M.J.,

S/O. LATE M.B. JAYEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

R/O MAKONAHALLI VILLAGE,

MUDIGERE TALUK 3 577 101

CHIKKAMGALUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT

(BY SMT.NEERAJA KARANTH,

ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K.SHRIHARI)

2

THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER

SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 16.08.2016 PASSED BY THE II

ADDL.

SESSIONS

JUDGE

CHIKAMAGALUR

IN

CRL.A.NO.400/2013 AND ORDER DATED 06.11.2013 PASSED

BY THE COURT OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT

MUDIGERE

IN

C.C.NO.1237/2006,

CONVICTION

AND

SENTENCE U/S 255(2) OF CRPC, CONVICTED FOR THE

OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NI ACT, AND SENTENCED TO

UNDERGO S.I. FOR 1 YEAR ALONG WITH COMPENSATION

AWARDED RS.5,60,000/- TO THE RESPONDENT AND ETC.,

THIS CRIMINAL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top