SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - BENCH AT DHARWAD
K. SUREKHA – Appellant
Versus
A. SANTOSH KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT

CRL.P. NO. 101561 OF 2020

BETWEEN:

SMT. K. SUREKHA W/O K. SRINIVAS SETTY

AGE:44 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, PARTNER OF FIRM,

R/O 8TH WARD, VENKATESHWAR NILAY,

PARVATHI NAGAR, NEAR CHAGI ADENA HOUSE,

SIRUGUPPA-583121, DISTRICT-BALLARI.

&PETITIONER

(BY SRI. DAYANAND M BANDI, ADV.)

AND:

A. SANTOSH KUMAR

S/O LATE PANDURANG SETTY

AGE:45 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,

R/O 18TH WARD, #24,

SADASHIV NAGAR, BALLARI ROAD,

SIRUGUPPA-583121, DIST:BALLARI.

&RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. R.M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.

PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2015 PASSED BY THE

COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRUGUPPA IN CC NO.1104/2015

(PC NO.84/2015) IN TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS

ACT AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND CONSEQUENTLY TO QUASH

THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC NO.1104/2015

PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIRUGUPPA.

R

2

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top