SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHINTANA – Appellant
Versus
SRI PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO

R.P.F.C. No.98 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

1.

CHINTANA

S/O PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI

AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS

2.

SMT. YASHODA R.,

W/O PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

BOTH ARE R/O RAMAPPA R

AVVA NILAYA

BEHIND GANAPATHI TEMPLE

HARIHARA 3 577 601.

PETITIONER NO.1 BEING MINOR

REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND

NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO.2.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. S.B. HALLI, ADVOCATE

APPEARED THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING)

AND:

SRI. PRAKASH

TAGADINAMANI

S/O FAKKIRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

2

R/O BGVS PU. COLLEGE

JOIDA, NORTH CANARA DISTRICT

UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT 3 581186.

&RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. G.S.BALAGANGADHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT)

APPEARED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT

ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:09.03.2017 PASSED IN

CRL.MISC.NO.243/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT

AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, C/C JUDGE, FAMILY

COURT, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED

UNDER SEC. 125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top