CHINTANA – Appellant
Versus
SRI PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
R.P.F.C. No.98 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
1.
CHINTANA
S/O PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI
AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
2.
SMT. YASHODA R.,
W/O PRAKASH TAGADINAMANI
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O RAMAPPA R
AVVA NILAYA
BEHIND GANAPATHI TEMPLE
HARIHARA 3 577 601.
PETITIONER NO.1 BEING MINOR
REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND
NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO.2.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S.B. HALLI, ADVOCATE
APPEARED THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING)
AND:
SRI. PRAKASH
TAGADINAMANI
S/O FAKKIRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
2
R/O BGVS PU. COLLEGE
JOIDA, NORTH CANARA DISTRICT
UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT 3 581186.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. G.S.BALAGANGADHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT)
APPEARED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT
ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:09.03.2017 PASSED IN
CRL.MISC.NO.243/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, C/C JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED
UNDER SEC. 125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.