SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SMT. RADHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 20846/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK.S.KINAGI

WRIT PETITION NO.20846 OF 2021 (LA-UDA)

BETWEEN:

SMT.RADHAMMA

W/O LATE P.H.KRISHNAPPA

AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS

R/AT NO.268, 6TH CROSS,

1ST MAIN ROAD, CHANNAKESHAVANAGARA,

ELECTRONIC CITY,

BANGALORE-560 100.

& PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAVI KUMAR G.H., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

REPT. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

VIKAS SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BENGALURU-560001

2.

THE SPECAIL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,

BANGALORE-560001.

3.

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

VISWESWARAIAH TOWER,

3RD FLOOR, FODIUM BLOCK,

AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BANGALORE-560001.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.H.C.KAVITHA, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)

- 2 -

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2

AND 3 TO CONIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD.01.09.2021

VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND G THEREBY TO CONDUCT THE SURVEY

AND FIX THE BOUNDARY IN RESPECT OF NOTIFIED LAND

MEASURING

1

ACRE

15

GUNTAS

IS

SY.NO.82

OF

NAGANATHAPURA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH

TALUK AS PER NOTIFICATIONS VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND E.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the

respondents.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition

seeking for a mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3

to consider the representation dated 01.09.2021 vide

Annexures 'F' & 'G'.

3.

Learned HCGP submits that if a reasonable

time is granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3, they would

consider

the

representation

dated

01.09.2021

vide

Annexures 'F' & 'G' and pass appropriate order in

accordance with law.

4.

The submission is placed on record.

- 3 -

Accordingly, the writ petitioner is disposed of

directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the

representation dated 14.10.2019 vide Annexures 'F' & 'G'

and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ssb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top