SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MR SAMPATHLAL BHAVESH KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL – Respondent
WP 13162/2021



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

WRIT PETITION No.13162 OF 2021(GM-RES)

BETWEEN :

MR. SAMPATHLAL BHAVESH KUMAR JAIN

S/O SAMPATHLAL JAIN

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

PROPRIETOR

PAVITHRR GOLD

NO.1037, K.R.HOSPITAL ROAD

LASHKAR MOHALLA

MYSORE-570 001 &PETITIONER

(BY SHRI. H. SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND :

1.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE

INTELLIGENCE

7TH FLOOR, D BLOCK

I.P.BHAVAN, I.P.ESTATE

NEW DELHI-110 002

2.

THE SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER

DIRECTORATE OF

REVENUE INTELLIGENCE

BANGALORE ZONAL UNIT

8TH (B) 2, OPP.BDA SHOPPING

COMPLEX, 1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK

2

H.P.R. LAYOUT

BANGALORE-560 043. ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, CGSC)

. . . .

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE

RESPONDENTS

TO

CONSIDER

THE

REPRESENTATION

OF

THE

PETITIONER DATED 17.06.2021 AND RELEASE THE SEIZED GOLD

BARS VIDE ANENXURE-A AND A1 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER U/S

110(A) OF THE CUSTOMS ACT 1962.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 8B9 GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer inter

alia to release the gold seized by the Directorate of Revenue

Intelligence ('DRI' for short).

2.

Shri. Vikram Aditya Huilgol, learned Central

Government Standing Counsel for respondent DRI submitted

that the release of gold will have to be considered by the

adjudicating authority. Petitioner's application for release as

per Annexures - A & A1 will be considered in accordance

with law. He further submitted that the petitioner be

3

directed to co-operate with the Investigating Officers and

the adjudicating authority, to establish the ownership of the

goods.

3.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of

with a direction to respondents to consider petitioner's

request made at Annexures - A and A1 as expeditiously as

possible in accordance with law, within an outer limit of six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Petitioner shall co-operate with the investigating authority

and participate in the proceedings.

Petition is disposed of.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SPS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top