SRI I Y DEVARAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 22448/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO.22448 OF 2021 (LB-ELE)
BETWEEN:
SRI. I.Y. DEVARAJ
S/O YEDIYURAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
MEMBER
IPPADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 126 .... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAVEEN J.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL
DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ
M.S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 560 001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
1ST FLOOR, NO.8
CUNNINGHHAM ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 052
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TUMKUR DISTRICT
TUMKUR - 572 101.
4.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
TUMKUR SUB DIVISION
TUMKUR - 572 101
2
5.
THE TAHASILDAR
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130.
6.
THE RETURNING OFFICER/
PRESCRIBED OFFICER
BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AGA FOR R1, R3 TO R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE INTIMATION
DATED:30.11.2021 ISSUED BY THE R5 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-B
TO WRIT PETITION DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO POSTPONE THE
ELECTION OF ADHYAKSHA TO THE GRAM PANCHAYATH OF IPPADI
GRAMA PANCHAYATH KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT TILL
THE COMPLETION OF ELECTION TO THE POST OF MEMBER WHICH
FELL VACANT DUE TO THE DEATH OF A MEMBER WHICH
SCHEDULE
ON
27.12.2021
AS
PER
ANNEXURE
-
A
BY
CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS ADDRESSED BY THE
PETITIONER MARKED AT ANNEXURE-C, D, E AND F DATED
1.12.2021 TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri.Naveen.J.N, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Smt.Prathima Honnapura, learned Additional Government
Advocate for Respondents 1, 3 to 6.
2. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question
the notification of election to the post of Adhyaksha of Ippadi
Gram Panchayath by the notification dated 30.11.2021.
3
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
emphasize on the fact that a member of the Gram
Panchayath died on 22.05.2021 and to fill up the vacancy
caused on account of the death of the member, the Election
Commission has notified Calender of Events on 29.11.2021 to
various Panchayaths which includes Ippadi Gram Panchayath.
Subsequently, on the very next day, the State Government
has issued a notification drawing up Calender of Events for
the election to the post of Adhyaksha of the said Gram
Panchayath. The petitioner is a member of the Gram
Panchayath who is always entitled to vote in the election to
the post of Adhyaksha as is notified on 30.11.2021.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner is that the election to the post of Adhyaksha of the
Gram Panchayath will have to wait the election of the
member of the Gram Panchayath is unacceptable on a plain
reading of Section 53 of the Karnataka Grama Swaraj and
Panchayath Raj Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Act'). Proviso to Section 53 of the Act makes it clear the
4
quorum for election to the post of Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha
of the Ippadi Gram Panchayath is 1½ of the total strength.
5. Therefore, in the absence of a member of the Gram
Panchayath, which has now become vacant due to the death
of a particular member will not come in the way of election to
be conducted for the post of Adhyaksha of the Gram
Panchayath slated to be held on 10.1