KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
M/S MAPSONS CNC PRESSWORK PVT LTD – Respondent
MFA 5469/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
MFA No.5469/2014
BETWEEN:
Karnataka State Financial Corporation,
No.1/1, Timmaiah Road,
Bengaluru -560 052.
Rep. by its Assistant General Manager.
&. Appellant
(By Sri. P.S. Malipatil, Advocate)
AND:
1. M/s. Mapsons CNC Presswork Pvt., Ltd.,
Having its registered office at
No.45, 1st Floor, Madhavaraya Mudaliyar Road,
Fraser Town, Bengaluru 3 560005.
Rep. by its Managing Director.
2. Shri. A. Anbazhagan,
S/o. Late P.M. Appadurai,
Aged about 61 years,
Madhavaraya Mudaliyar Road,
Fraser Town, Bengaluru - 560 005.
3. A. Thamayathi,
W/o. A. Anbazhagan,
Aged about 52 years,
Madhavaraya Mudaliyar Road,
Fraser Town, Bengaluru -560005.
2
4. Smt. V. Parvathi Ammal,
W/o. Late P.M. Appadurai,
(Dead on 21/07/2010)
(Resp.No.2, S/o. R.4 was already on
record as such, fresh LR9s were not
brought on record)
&
Respondents
(By Sri. B. Vachan, Advocate for R1 to R3; R2 is LR of deceased R4)
This Misc. First Appeal is filed under Section 32(9) of the State
Financial Corporations Act, 1951, against the order dated 19.06.2014,
passed by the Principal District Judge, Bangalore Rural District in
Misc.Case No.106/2009 dismissing the petition filed under Sections
31(1)(aa) and 32(1) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951.
This appeal coming on for admission being heard and reserved
for judgment on 04.08.2021, this day, Ravi V. Hosmani J.,
pronounced the following:
JUDGMENT
Challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2014
passed by Prl. District Judge, Bengaluru Rural Court, Bengaluru
in Misc. Case No.106/2009, this appeal is filed.
2. The appellant herein was the applicant while the
respondents Nos.1 to 4 herein are respondents before the Trial
Court. For the sake of convenience parties will hereinafter be
referred to as per their respective ranks before the Trial Court.
3. Brief facts as stated are that petitioner-appellant herein
had filed petition under Section 31(1)(aa) and Section 32(1) of
3
the State Finance Corporation Act (hereinafter for short 8the
Act9) stating that respondent no.1, a private limited company
had obtained financial assistance from it for setting up a small
scale industry for manufacture of high accuracy sheet metal
components. Respondent no.1 was granted term loan of Rs.46.60
lakhs to be repaid in 24 quarterly installments with compound
interest with quarterly rest at 16.5% per annum and in case of
default, with interest at 19% per annum on defaulted sum.
4. For securing the loan, a deed of hypothecation was
executed on 29.11.1994. The respondents no.2 to 4 executed
irrevocable
continuing
deed
of
guarantee
on
29.11.1994
undertaking to pay liabilities of respondent no.1, in case of
default. Respondent no.1 represented by it9s Director also
executed registered mortgage deed, mortgaging the factory,
land, building as well as movables in favour of petitioner.
5. Thereafter, pursuant to request of respondent no.1, an
additional term loan of Rs.15.40 lakhs was sanctioned to it on
06.09.1995, for purchase additional machinery. Respondent no.1
represented by it9s Director agreed for creation of further charge
over factory, land and buildings to cover additional term loan.
4
Deed of hypothecation was executed on 14.09.1995. Loan
agreement was also executed on 14.09.1995 agreeing to repay
additional term loan in 20 quarterly installments with compound
interest at 20% with quarterly rest and in default to pay interest
at 22.5% per annum on defaulted sum. Respondent nos.2 to 4
executed irrevocable continuing deed of guarantee on same day.
6. However, respondent no.1 defaulted in payment of loan
installments and sought rehabilitation package. Though, a
scheme was sanctioned, respondent no.1 did not avail it.
Therefore, petitioner recalled loan under