SRI T MUNI REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 50377/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO.50377/2018(SC/ST)
BETWEEN
1 .
SRI T MUNI REDDY
S/O SRI.THIMMAIAH REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE-560064.
2 .
SRI Y R RAVI KUMAR
S/O SRI.Y.M.RANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.42/A,
1ST A MAIN ROAD,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE-560064.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI M SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 .
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M S BUILDING, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2
2 .
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN
K G ROAD
BANGALORE-560009
3 .
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION
KANDAYA BHAVAN
K G ROAD, BANGALORE4560009
4 .
SRI VENKATASWAMY
S/O LATE MYSORU MUNISWAMY
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR9S
4(a) SRI RAJANNA
S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/A SURADEVANAPURA V ILLAGE
HESARAGHATTA HOBLI
BANGALORE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
BANGALORE-560089
5 .
SRI NARASIMHAIAH
S/O LATE MYSURU MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/A SURADEVANAPURA V ILLAGE
HESARAGHATTA HOBLI
BANGALORE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
BANGALORE-560089
6 .
SMT RAZIA FARUKHI
W/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
7 .
SRI ABDUL KHADAR FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
3
8 .
SRI MOHAMAD AMANULLA FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
9 .
SRI MOHAMAD RAFI FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
10 . SRI MOHAMAD AMEEN FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
11 . SRI MOHAMAD NASEER FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
12 . SRI MOHAMAD FARIS FARUKHI
S/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
13 . SMT H M KHADERI
D/O LATE M N FARUKHI
MAJOR
NO.6 TO 13 ARE R/A NO.31/13,
LOYALLA LAYOUT
VICTORIA ROAD CROSS
BANGALORE-560047
14 . SRI MUSHTAQ AHAMED
S/O LATE MOHAMED HANIEF
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/A NO.4, KUBER SINGH LANE
7TH CROSS, DODDAMAVALLI
BANGALORE-560004 & ALSO
AT NO.18, BENSON ROAD
BENSON TOWN
BANGALORE-560046
4
15 . SRI B BETTAIAH
S/O LATE BETTE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
R/A NO.29 & 30
7TH A CROSS, A MAIN ROAD
J P NAGAR, 2ND STAGE
BANGALORE-560078
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K S ARUN, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3
SRI B RAVINDRANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R5 & R15
SMT IRFANA NAZEER, ADVOCATE FOR R7
SRI R GURUPRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R14
R8,R10,R11,R12,R6,R9, R10 & R13 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A DTD 14.09.2015
MADE IN CASE NO.SC/ST(A) 95/2009-10, CONFIRMING
THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-B DTD 2.1.2008 IN K.SC/ST
APEAL NO.84/2005-06, PASSED BY THE R-2 AND 3 AND
DISMISS THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE R-4 AND 5
UNDER THE PROVISION OF SECTION 5 OF KARNATAKA
SC/ST(PTCL) ACT, 1978 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
This
writ
petition
is
similar
to
writ
petition
No.50375/2018 filed at the hands of the very same
petitioners. The only difference is that land in question is
different and the original grantee and their legal heirs are
5
different from the other writ petition. Whereas the
subsequent purchasers respondents No.6 to 14 are the
same as in the connected matter and respondent No.15 in
this writ petition is none else than respondent No.17 in the
connected matter.
2.
The connected writ petition was disposed of by
holding that petitioners have no locus to call in question
the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner and the
Deputy Commissioner under the provisions of the PTCL
Act.
3.
Consequently,
the
writ
petition
stands
disposed of in similar terms as in W.P.No.50375/2018.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KLY/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.