KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - BENCH AT KALBURAGI
HASIMPEER RAJAKSAB ALAND AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS – Respondent
WP 201461/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
W. P. No.201461/2021 (LB-ELE)
BETWEEN:
1. HASIMPEER RAJAKSAB ALAND,
AGE:38 YEARS,
OCC:MUNICIPALITY MEMBER
R/O TEKIA GALLI TIPPU SULTAN
CIRCLE SINDHAGI
TQ. SINDHAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586 128.
2. SHRISHAIL
S/O MALLAPPA BEERGOND,
AGE:31 YEARS, OCC:MUNICIPALITY MEMBER
R/O WARD NO.3
PUJARI GALLI KANAKADAS CIRCLE
SINDAGI
TQ. SINDHAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586 128
3. SMT. PRATIBHA
W/O SHIVAKUMAR KALLUR,
AGE:29 YEARS,
OCC: MUNICIPALITY MEMBER
R/O VIDYANAGAR 4TH CROSS SINDAGI,
TQ. SINDHAGI,
DIST: VIJAYAPUR-586 128
4. SMT. TAHASIN BANU
W/O ABID MULLA,
AGE:40 YEARS,
OCC: MUNICIPALITY MEMBER
R/O TEKIA GALLI TIPPU SULTAN
2
CIRCLE SINDHAGI
TQ. SINDHAGI,
DIST:VIJAYAPUR-586 128.
PETITIONERS
(BY SRI JAYAKUMAR S. PATIL, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG
WITH SRI AMRESH S. ROJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION,
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-1,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
VIJAYAPUR-586 101
3. THE TAHASILDAR,
SINDHAGI,
DIST: VIJAYAPUR-586 128.
4. THE CHIEF OFFICER,
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
SINDHAGI, DIST: VIJAYAPUR-586 128
5. H.R. ALGUR,
AGE:60 YEARS,
OCC: DISTRICT CONGRESS PRESIDENT,
R/O CONGRESS OFFICE COURT ROAD
VIJAYPUR-586 101.
6. SHARANAPPA,
S/O TIPPANNA SUNAGAR,
AGE:64 YEARS,
OCC: EX MLA SINDAGI
R/O TIPPU SULTAN CIRCLE SINDAGI
TQ. SINDHAGI,
DIST: VIJAYAPUR-586 128.
… RESPONDENTS
(SRI SHIVAKUMAR KOLLOOR, ADVOCATE FOR
CAVEATORS/RESPONDENT NOS.5 AND 6
3
SMT. ANURADHA M. DESAI, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR
RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3
NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE
ORDER DATED 09.08.2021)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY
OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION QUASHING
THE IMPUGNED ORDER UNDER ANNEXURE-J DATED
22.07.2021
IN
REFERENCE
NO.KAVI/CHUNAVANE/CR-
41/2020-21 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 09.08.2021 AND COMING
ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though this writ petition was listed for preliminary
hearing, since the contesting respondent No.5 has entered
caveat and the learned counsel for the parties consented
for taking up the writ petition for final disposal, the same
was finally heard.
2.
This writ petition is filed challenging the order
passed by the respondent No.2 dated 22.07.2021 in
Reference No.KaVi/Chunavane/CR-41/2020-21, by which
the petitioners were disqualified under the provisions of
the Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection)
Act, 1987 (henceforth referred to as "the Act of 1987” ).
4
3.
The writ petition discloses that the councillors
of the respondent No.4 - City Municipal Council were
elected at the elections held on 8.10.2020. The following
were the party-wise distribution of seats in the respondent
No.4:
Party
Number
of seats
Indian National Congress
11
Janata Dal (Secular)
06
Bharatiya Janata Party
03
Independents
03
Total
23
4.
In the present case, the petitioners were all
elected councillors from the Indian National Congress
(henceforth referred to as 'INC' in short). It was
contended that two independent councillors had joined INC
and thus their strength in respondent No.4 was increased
to 13.
5.
The election to the post of President and Vice
President of the respondent No.4 was held on 03.11.2020.
It is stated that at the said election, the petitioners
disobeyed a whip issued by their party and cross voted in
favour of a candidate from Janata Dal (Secular) (for short,
5
'JD(S)' and another who were declared as the returned
candidates for the post of President and Vice President.
6.
The respon