SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRI. UMESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. N. MEENA ALIAS MEENAKSHI – Respondent


W.P.No.32629/2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

BEFORE

THE HON9BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

WRIT PETITION No.32629/2018(GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI. UMESH KUMAR,

S/O SRI. C.V.JOSHI,

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

R/AT HIG NO.3, AGRAHARA,

DASARAHALLI EXTENSION,

KHB COLONY, BASAVESHARANAGAR,

BANGALORE 3 560 079.

& PETITIONER

(BY SRI.A.BALAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. N.MEENA

ALIAS MEENAKSHI,

W/O SRI. V.VIJAYAKUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

R/AT NO.622, 2ND STAGE,

2ND BLOCK, NARAYANA NAGAR,

DODDAKALLASANDRA,

BANGALORE 3 560 062.

& RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. H.G.LAGALI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

DATED 31.05.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.7 IN O.S.NO.3997 OF

2016 ON THE FILE OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-62),

BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE-E BY ALLOWING THIS W.P.

AND ETC.

THIS

PETITION

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

W.P.No.32629/2018

2

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the respondent is absent.

Heard the petitioner9s counsel.

<Whether the trial Court committed error and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top