SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 373

D. S. RAMACHANDRA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent


ORDER

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the first and third respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

2. The petitioner who is a member of the Bar has filed this public interest litigation inviting the attention of the Court to the encroachments made on foot paths/ footways in a particular location in the city. The second prayer is for making a particular street for one-way street and the third prayer is for ensuring that all road signals are erected. There are compliance reports filed on record. In fact, as per the order dated 18th January 2021 passed by this Court, the Member Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru, visited the street subject matter of this petition and has submitted a report dated 1st February 2021 along with the photographs. We must note here that in the affidavit filed by the petitioner on 25th March 2021, he has stated that positive actions have been taken by the authorities. He has expressed an apprehension that with the passage of time and after change of present set of officers, their successors may not take any action.

3. A large

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top